When the pandemic hit in the spring of 2020, many private companies and public administrations had to resort to working-from-home (WFH) arrangements for their employees. While remote working was rather uncommon before the pandemic, this became the prevalent work arrangement for a large fraction of the working population. Aim of the analysis is to investigate the workers transition to teleworking evaluating the impact of demographic and jobs’ characteristics on the probability of having worked from home, partially or totally, during the second wave of the pandemic. The data used in this study are from the last Ninth Survey on Labour Participation and Unemployment (PLUS), thus a sample survey on the Italian labour market supply developed and administered by the National Institute for the Analysis of Public Policies (INAPP). Remote working experience is considered positive by 55% of workers and less than 10% believe it was negative. Fitting a logistic regression model, it is possible to estimate the different attitudes among workers more accurately. The probability to work from home is slightly higher for males, older workers, white-collar, high-skilled, well-educated, industrial and service sector employees. There is also a clear disadvantage for those who have a low-medium education level and for low-skilled workers. Moreover, many respondents would choose new ways of working such as from small village and from countryside/mountain.

Remote working and new forms of work: evidence from Inapp-Plus / Cardone, PAOLO EMILIO. - In: RIVISTA ITALIANA DI ECONOMIA, DEMOGRAFIA E STATISTICA. - ISSN 0035-6832. - Volume LXXVII n.4:(2023), pp. 97-108.

Remote working and new forms of work: evidence from Inapp-Plus

Cardone Paolo Emilio
2023

Abstract

When the pandemic hit in the spring of 2020, many private companies and public administrations had to resort to working-from-home (WFH) arrangements for their employees. While remote working was rather uncommon before the pandemic, this became the prevalent work arrangement for a large fraction of the working population. Aim of the analysis is to investigate the workers transition to teleworking evaluating the impact of demographic and jobs’ characteristics on the probability of having worked from home, partially or totally, during the second wave of the pandemic. The data used in this study are from the last Ninth Survey on Labour Participation and Unemployment (PLUS), thus a sample survey on the Italian labour market supply developed and administered by the National Institute for the Analysis of Public Policies (INAPP). Remote working experience is considered positive by 55% of workers and less than 10% believe it was negative. Fitting a logistic regression model, it is possible to estimate the different attitudes among workers more accurately. The probability to work from home is slightly higher for males, older workers, white-collar, high-skilled, well-educated, industrial and service sector employees. There is also a clear disadvantage for those who have a low-medium education level and for low-skilled workers. Moreover, many respondents would choose new ways of working such as from small village and from countryside/mountain.
2023
Remote working; South working; Logistic model
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Remote working and new forms of work: evidence from Inapp-Plus / Cardone, PAOLO EMILIO. - In: RIVISTA ITALIANA DI ECONOMIA, DEMOGRAFIA E STATISTICA. - ISSN 0035-6832. - Volume LXXVII n.4:(2023), pp. 97-108.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Cardone_Remote-Working_2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 423.97 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
423.97 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1704451
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact