Patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp infection often present a complex scenario. In 147 severely ill patients with septic shock and/or COVID-19 and multiple treatment failures, clinical success following cefiderocol treatment was 53.1% overall, and 62.5% in those without septic shock.Background Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections are difficult to treat and are a significant public health threat due to intrinsic/acquired resistance and limited treatment options. Methods A retrospective, observational cohort study in patients receiving cefiderocol via Shionogi's early access program for Acinetobacter spp infections (1 April 2020-30 April 2021; 27 sites; Italy, Spain, Germany, France). Primary outcome was clinical success, defined as clinical resolution of infection at day 14 or day 28 survival. Results Overall, 147 patients were included. Primary infection sites were respiratory (65.3%) and bloodstream (unknown source [15.6%]; catheter-related [10.9%]); 24.5% of patients had polymicrobial infection. Of 136 patients in intensive care (92.5%), 85.3% (116/136) received mechanical ventilation. Septic shock (55.6% [70/126]) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (81.6%) were prevalent. Prior to cefiderocol, 85.0% of patients received gram-negative treatment, 61.2% received & GE;2 antimicrobials, and most received colistin (58.5%; median duration, 11.5 days). Cefiderocol monotherapy was used in 30.6% of patients. Clinical success rate was 53.1% and was higher in patients without septic shock (62.5%), without COVID-19 (77.8%), and with lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (quartile 1 [median, 3; range, 0-5]: 82.9%). Day 28 survival was 44.9% and was higher in patients without septic shock (60.7%), without COVID-19 (59.3%), with lower SOFA score (quartile 1: 82.9%), and receiving first-line cefiderocol (68.2% [15/22]). Resolution of infection at day 14 occurred in 39.5% of patients. Conclusions Despite use in complex patients with limited treatment options and high septic shock/COVID-19 rates, cefiderocol treatment was associated with an overall clinical success rate of 53%.

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp infection in critically Ill patients with limited treatment options. A descriptive study of cefiderocol therapy during the Covid-19 pandemic / Giannella, Maddalena; Verardi, Stefano; Karas, Andreas; Abdel Hadi, Hasania; Dupont, Hervé; Soriano, Alex; Santerre Henriksen, Anne; Cooper, Andrew; Falcone, Marco. - In: OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES. - ISSN 2328-8957. - 10:7(2023), pp. 1-10. [10.1093/ofid/ofad329]

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp infection in critically Ill patients with limited treatment options. A descriptive study of cefiderocol therapy during the Covid-19 pandemic

Giannella, Maddalena
;
Falcone, Marco
2023

Abstract

Patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp infection often present a complex scenario. In 147 severely ill patients with septic shock and/or COVID-19 and multiple treatment failures, clinical success following cefiderocol treatment was 53.1% overall, and 62.5% in those without septic shock.Background Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections are difficult to treat and are a significant public health threat due to intrinsic/acquired resistance and limited treatment options. Methods A retrospective, observational cohort study in patients receiving cefiderocol via Shionogi's early access program for Acinetobacter spp infections (1 April 2020-30 April 2021; 27 sites; Italy, Spain, Germany, France). Primary outcome was clinical success, defined as clinical resolution of infection at day 14 or day 28 survival. Results Overall, 147 patients were included. Primary infection sites were respiratory (65.3%) and bloodstream (unknown source [15.6%]; catheter-related [10.9%]); 24.5% of patients had polymicrobial infection. Of 136 patients in intensive care (92.5%), 85.3% (116/136) received mechanical ventilation. Septic shock (55.6% [70/126]) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (81.6%) were prevalent. Prior to cefiderocol, 85.0% of patients received gram-negative treatment, 61.2% received & GE;2 antimicrobials, and most received colistin (58.5%; median duration, 11.5 days). Cefiderocol monotherapy was used in 30.6% of patients. Clinical success rate was 53.1% and was higher in patients without septic shock (62.5%), without COVID-19 (77.8%), and with lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores (quartile 1 [median, 3; range, 0-5]: 82.9%). Day 28 survival was 44.9% and was higher in patients without septic shock (60.7%), without COVID-19 (59.3%), with lower SOFA score (quartile 1: 82.9%), and receiving first-line cefiderocol (68.2% [15/22]). Resolution of infection at day 14 occurred in 39.5% of patients. Conclusions Despite use in complex patients with limited treatment options and high septic shock/COVID-19 rates, cefiderocol treatment was associated with an overall clinical success rate of 53%.
2023
acinetobacter; covid-19; cefiderocol; mortality; septic shock
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp infection in critically Ill patients with limited treatment options. A descriptive study of cefiderocol therapy during the Covid-19 pandemic / Giannella, Maddalena; Verardi, Stefano; Karas, Andreas; Abdel Hadi, Hasania; Dupont, Hervé; Soriano, Alex; Santerre Henriksen, Anne; Cooper, Andrew; Falcone, Marco. - In: OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES. - ISSN 2328-8957. - 10:7(2023), pp. 1-10. [10.1093/ofid/ofad329]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Giannella_Carbapenem_2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 537.98 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
537.98 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1702883
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact