The overall low-quality evidence concerning the clinical benefits of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE), which has made it difficult to strongly support or reject any regimen of antibiotic therapy, has led to a discrepancy between the available guidelines and clinical practice. In this complex scenario, very recently published guidelines have attempted to fill this gap. Indeed, in recent years several antimicrobials have entered the market, including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, and the long-acting lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin. Despite being approved for different indications, real-world data on their use for the treatment of IE, alone or in combination, has accumulated over time. Furthermore, an old antibiotic, fosfomycin, has gained renewed interest for the treatment of complicated infections such as IE. In this narrative review, we focused on new antimicrobials and therapeutic strategies that we believe may provide important contributions to the advancement of Gram-positive IE treatment, providing a summary of the current in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence supporting their use in clinical practice.

New antimicrobials and new therapy strategies for endocarditis. Weapons that should be defended / Oliva, Alessandra; Cogliati Dezza, Francesco; Cancelli, Francesca; Curtolo, Ambrogio; Falletta, Antonio; Volpicelli, Lorenzo; Venditti, Mario. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 12:24(2023), pp. 1-49. [10.3390/jcm12247693]

New antimicrobials and new therapy strategies for endocarditis. Weapons that should be defended

Oliva, Alessandra
Conceptualization
;
Cogliati Dezza, Francesco;Curtolo, Ambrogio;Falletta, Antonio;Volpicelli, Lorenzo;Venditti, Mario
2023

Abstract

The overall low-quality evidence concerning the clinical benefits of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE), which has made it difficult to strongly support or reject any regimen of antibiotic therapy, has led to a discrepancy between the available guidelines and clinical practice. In this complex scenario, very recently published guidelines have attempted to fill this gap. Indeed, in recent years several antimicrobials have entered the market, including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, and the long-acting lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin. Despite being approved for different indications, real-world data on their use for the treatment of IE, alone or in combination, has accumulated over time. Furthermore, an old antibiotic, fosfomycin, has gained renewed interest for the treatment of complicated infections such as IE. In this narrative review, we focused on new antimicrobials and therapeutic strategies that we believe may provide important contributions to the advancement of Gram-positive IE treatment, providing a summary of the current in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence supporting their use in clinical practice.
2023
ceftaroline; ceftobiprole; dalbavancin; fosfomycin; infective endocarditis; long-acting lipoglycopeptides; oral therapy; oritavancin; strategy
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
New antimicrobials and new therapy strategies for endocarditis. Weapons that should be defended / Oliva, Alessandra; Cogliati Dezza, Francesco; Cancelli, Francesca; Curtolo, Ambrogio; Falletta, Antonio; Volpicelli, Lorenzo; Venditti, Mario. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 12:24(2023), pp. 1-49. [10.3390/jcm12247693]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Oliva_New-antimicrobials_2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 917.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
917.04 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1702878
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact