Emotional factors in leaders have been found to be important in practicing sustainable leadership. Recent studies have highlighted that leaders with adaptive emotional regulation tend to exhibit sustainable leadership more frequently. However, it is not clear why emotional regulation can enable leaders to act sustainably with their followers. We aim to investigate whether being able to feel safe in social contexts may be a factor that explains the relationship between emotional regulation and sustainable leadership. N = 413 managers filled out self-report questionnaires assessing emotion dysregulation, social safeness, and sustainable leadership. Women showed high social safeness than males, whereas no gender differences were found in levels of emotional dysregulation and sustainable leadership. The hypothesized mediation model was tested, showing both a direct effect of emotional dysregulation on sustainable leadership, and an indirect effect, via social safeness. This result has important implications for the possibility of creating business programs focused on emotional regulation.
The relationship between emotion regulation and sustainable leadership: The mediating role of social safeness / Ballarotto, Giulia; Abate, Raffaella; Baiocco, Roberto; Velotti, Patrizia. - In: JOURNAL OF HUMAN OF BEHAVIOR IN THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT. - ISSN 1091-1359. - (2024), pp. -14. [10.1080/10911359.2024.2302512]
The relationship between emotion regulation and sustainable leadership: The mediating role of social safeness
Ballarotto, Giulia;Abate, Raffaella;Baiocco, Roberto;Velotti, Patrizia
2024
Abstract
Emotional factors in leaders have been found to be important in practicing sustainable leadership. Recent studies have highlighted that leaders with adaptive emotional regulation tend to exhibit sustainable leadership more frequently. However, it is not clear why emotional regulation can enable leaders to act sustainably with their followers. We aim to investigate whether being able to feel safe in social contexts may be a factor that explains the relationship between emotional regulation and sustainable leadership. N = 413 managers filled out self-report questionnaires assessing emotion dysregulation, social safeness, and sustainable leadership. Women showed high social safeness than males, whereas no gender differences were found in levels of emotional dysregulation and sustainable leadership. The hypothesized mediation model was tested, showing both a direct effect of emotional dysregulation on sustainable leadership, and an indirect effect, via social safeness. This result has important implications for the possibility of creating business programs focused on emotional regulation.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.