Background and purpose: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic criteria, ancillary investigations and treatment response using real-life data in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) patients. Methods: Clinical and laboratory data were collected from 110 patients enrolled in the Italian MMN database through a structured questionnaire. Twenty-six patients were excluded due to the unavailability of nerve conduction studies or the presence of clinical signs and symptoms and electrodiagnostic abnormalities inconsistent with the MMN diagnosis. Analyses were conducted on 73 patients with a confirmed MMN diagnosis and 11 patients who did not meet the diagnostic criteria. Results: The European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) diagnostic criteria were variably applied. Author: When applying the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine criteria, an additional 17% of patients fulfilled the criteria for probable/definite diagnosis whilst a further 9.5% missed the diagnosis. In 17% of the patients only compound muscle action potential amplitude, but not area, was measured and subsequently recorded in the database by the treating physician. Additional investigations, including anti-GM1 immunoglobulin M antibodies, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, nerve ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, supported the diagnosis in 46%-83% of the patients. Anti-GM1 immunoglobulin M antibodies and nerve ultrasound demonstrated the highest sensitivity. Additional tests were frequently performed outside the EFNS/PNS guideline recommendations. Conclusions: This study provides insights into the real-world diagnostic and management strategies for MMN, highlighting the challenges in applying diagnostic criteria.

Assessment of diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy in patients included in the Italian database / Doneddu, Pietro Emiliano; Gentile, Luca; Cocito, Dario; Fazio, Raffaella; Luigetti, Marco; Briani, Chiara; Filosto, Massimiliano; Siciliano, Gabriele; Benedetti, Luana; Antonini, Giovanni; Matà, Sabrina; Marfia, Girolama Alessandra; Inghilleri, Maurizio; Manganelli, Fiore; Cosentino, Giuseppe; Brighina, Filippo; Carpo, Marinella; Carta, Francesca; Mazzeo, Anna; Peci, Erdita; Strano, Camilla; Romano, Angela; Campagnolo, Marta; Cotti-Piccinelli, Stefano; Viola, Divina Valeria; Germano, Francesco; Leonardi, Luca; Sperti, Martina; Mataluni, Giorgia; Ceccanti, Marco; Spina, Emanuele; Vegezzi, Elisa; Di Stefano, Vincenzo; Nobile-Orazio, Eduardo. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY. - ISSN 1468-1331. - (2024). [10.1111/ene.16248]

Assessment of diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy in patients included in the Italian database

Antonini, Giovanni;Inghilleri, Maurizio;Leonardi, Luca;Ceccanti, Marco;
2024

Abstract

Background and purpose: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic criteria, ancillary investigations and treatment response using real-life data in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) patients. Methods: Clinical and laboratory data were collected from 110 patients enrolled in the Italian MMN database through a structured questionnaire. Twenty-six patients were excluded due to the unavailability of nerve conduction studies or the presence of clinical signs and symptoms and electrodiagnostic abnormalities inconsistent with the MMN diagnosis. Analyses were conducted on 73 patients with a confirmed MMN diagnosis and 11 patients who did not meet the diagnostic criteria. Results: The European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) diagnostic criteria were variably applied. Author: When applying the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine criteria, an additional 17% of patients fulfilled the criteria for probable/definite diagnosis whilst a further 9.5% missed the diagnosis. In 17% of the patients only compound muscle action potential amplitude, but not area, was measured and subsequently recorded in the database by the treating physician. Additional investigations, including anti-GM1 immunoglobulin M antibodies, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, nerve ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, supported the diagnosis in 46%-83% of the patients. Anti-GM1 immunoglobulin M antibodies and nerve ultrasound demonstrated the highest sensitivity. Additional tests were frequently performed outside the EFNS/PNS guideline recommendations. Conclusions: This study provides insights into the real-world diagnostic and management strategies for MMN, highlighting the challenges in applying diagnostic criteria.
2024
MMN; diagnosis; diagnostic criteria; guidelines; multifocal motor neuropathy
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Assessment of diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy in patients included in the Italian database / Doneddu, Pietro Emiliano; Gentile, Luca; Cocito, Dario; Fazio, Raffaella; Luigetti, Marco; Briani, Chiara; Filosto, Massimiliano; Siciliano, Gabriele; Benedetti, Luana; Antonini, Giovanni; Matà, Sabrina; Marfia, Girolama Alessandra; Inghilleri, Maurizio; Manganelli, Fiore; Cosentino, Giuseppe; Brighina, Filippo; Carpo, Marinella; Carta, Francesca; Mazzeo, Anna; Peci, Erdita; Strano, Camilla; Romano, Angela; Campagnolo, Marta; Cotti-Piccinelli, Stefano; Viola, Divina Valeria; Germano, Francesco; Leonardi, Luca; Sperti, Martina; Mataluni, Giorgia; Ceccanti, Marco; Spina, Emanuele; Vegezzi, Elisa; Di Stefano, Vincenzo; Nobile-Orazio, Eduardo. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY. - ISSN 1468-1331. - (2024). [10.1111/ene.16248]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
59. Assessment of diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy in patients included in the Italian database.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Doneddu_Assessment of diagnostic criteria_2024
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 830.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
830.3 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1702491
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact