Non-structural elements, such as infill walls, precast r.c., timber panels, machines, cabinets, art objects, etc. can be considered as rigid rocking blocks whose seismic vulnerability may be reduced by means of dissipative and recentering devices. These devices can be installed in different positions of the rigid block. This paper proposes an equivalence criterion to compare dashpots installed either at the base or at the top of rocking blocks in terms of damping coefficients. An analytical expression is obtained and validated through deterministic and stochastic approaches. The first aims to compare the two scenarios' performances, while the second introduces a probabilistic assessment in terms of fragility curves and seismic demand hazard. The comparisons exhibit an optimal agreement, making the analytical formulation reliable for design purposes.
Equivalence of Damping Properties of Dissipative Devices for Mitigating the Seismic Risk of Rigid Blocks / Giresini, Linda; Al Shawa, Omar; Argiento, Luca Umberto; Casapulla, Claudia. - (2023), pp. 1-18. (Intervento presentato al convegno COMPDYN 2023 9th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering tenutosi a Atene).
Equivalence of Damping Properties of Dissipative Devices for Mitigating the Seismic Risk of Rigid Blocks
Giresini, Linda
Primo
Supervision
;Al Shawa, Omar;
2023
Abstract
Non-structural elements, such as infill walls, precast r.c., timber panels, machines, cabinets, art objects, etc. can be considered as rigid rocking blocks whose seismic vulnerability may be reduced by means of dissipative and recentering devices. These devices can be installed in different positions of the rigid block. This paper proposes an equivalence criterion to compare dashpots installed either at the base or at the top of rocking blocks in terms of damping coefficients. An analytical expression is obtained and validated through deterministic and stochastic approaches. The first aims to compare the two scenarios' performances, while the second introduces a probabilistic assessment in terms of fragility curves and seismic demand hazard. The comparisons exhibit an optimal agreement, making the analytical formulation reliable for design purposes.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Giresini_Equivalence_2023.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.3 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.3 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.