This review quantified the association of vaccine literacy (VL) and vaccination intention and status. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Any study, published until December 2022, that investigated the associations of interest were eligible. For each outcome, articles were grouped according to the vaccine administrated and results were narratively synthesized. Inverse-variance random-effect models were used to compare standardized mean values in VL domain(s) between the two groups: individuals willing vs. unwilling to get vaccinated, and individuals vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. This review of 18 studies shows that VL strongly predicts the vaccination intention while its association with vaccination status is attenuated and barely significant, suggesting that other factors influence the actual vaccination uptake. However, given the scarce evidence available, the heterogeneity in the methods applied and some limitations of the studies included, further research should be conducted to confirm the role of VL in the vaccination decision-making process.

How well does vaccine literacy predict intention to vaccinate and vaccination status? A systematic review and meta-analysis / Isonne, C.; Iera, J.; Sciurti, A.; Renzi, E.; De Blasiis, M. R.; Marzuillo, C.; Villari, P.; Baccolini, V.. - In: HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS. - ISSN 2164-554X. - 20:1(2024), pp. 1-16. [10.1080/21645515.2023.2300848]

How well does vaccine literacy predict intention to vaccinate and vaccination status? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Isonne C.
Primo
;
Iera J.;Sciurti A.;Renzi E.;De Blasiis M. R.;Marzuillo C.;Villari P.;Baccolini V.
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

This review quantified the association of vaccine literacy (VL) and vaccination intention and status. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched. Any study, published until December 2022, that investigated the associations of interest were eligible. For each outcome, articles were grouped according to the vaccine administrated and results were narratively synthesized. Inverse-variance random-effect models were used to compare standardized mean values in VL domain(s) between the two groups: individuals willing vs. unwilling to get vaccinated, and individuals vaccinated vs. unvaccinated. This review of 18 studies shows that VL strongly predicts the vaccination intention while its association with vaccination status is attenuated and barely significant, suggesting that other factors influence the actual vaccination uptake. However, given the scarce evidence available, the heterogeneity in the methods applied and some limitations of the studies included, further research should be conducted to confirm the role of VL in the vaccination decision-making process.
2024
vaccine literacy; meta-analysis; systematic review; vaccination; vaccination behavior
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
How well does vaccine literacy predict intention to vaccinate and vaccination status? A systematic review and meta-analysis / Isonne, C.; Iera, J.; Sciurti, A.; Renzi, E.; De Blasiis, M. R.; Marzuillo, C.; Villari, P.; Baccolini, V.. - In: HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS. - ISSN 2164-554X. - 20:1(2024), pp. 1-16. [10.1080/21645515.2023.2300848]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Isonne_vaccine-literacy_2024.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 6.64 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.64 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1700417
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact