Objective: To investigate the impact of invasive functional guidance for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) on graft failure. Background: Data on the impact of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in guiding CABG are still limited. Methods: Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis were performed. Primary objective was the risk of graft failure, stratified by FFR. Risk estimates are reported as odds ratios (ORs) derived from the aggregated data using random-effects models. Individual patient data were analyzed using mixed effect model to assess relationship between FFR and graft failure. This meta-analysis is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020180444). Results: Four prospective studies comprising 503 patients referred for CABG, with 1471 coronaries, assessed by FFR were included. Graft status was available for 1039 conduits at median of 12.0 [IQR 6.6; 12.0] months. Risk of graft failure was higher in vessels with preserved FFR (OR 5.74, 95% CI 1.71–19.29). Every 0.10 FFR units decrease in the coronaries was associated with 56% risk reduction of graft failure (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.59). FFR cut-off to predict graft failure was 0.79. Conclusion: Surgical grafting of coronaries with functionally nonsignificant stenoses was associated with higher risk of graft failure.

Influence of fractional flow reserve on grafts patency. Systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis / G. Toth, G.; Collet, C.; Langhoff Thuesen, A.; Mizukami, T.; Casselman, F.; Riber, L. P.; Van Praet, F.; Junker, A.; Nagumo, S.; De Bruyne, B.; Okkels Jensen, L.; Barbato, E.. - In: CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS. - ISSN 1522-1946. - 99:3(2022), pp. 730-735. [10.1002/ccd.29864]

Influence of fractional flow reserve on grafts patency. Systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis

Barbato E.
2022

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the impact of invasive functional guidance for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) on graft failure. Background: Data on the impact of fractional flow reserve (FFR) in guiding CABG are still limited. Methods: Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis were performed. Primary objective was the risk of graft failure, stratified by FFR. Risk estimates are reported as odds ratios (ORs) derived from the aggregated data using random-effects models. Individual patient data were analyzed using mixed effect model to assess relationship between FFR and graft failure. This meta-analysis is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020180444). Results: Four prospective studies comprising 503 patients referred for CABG, with 1471 coronaries, assessed by FFR were included. Graft status was available for 1039 conduits at median of 12.0 [IQR 6.6; 12.0] months. Risk of graft failure was higher in vessels with preserved FFR (OR 5.74, 95% CI 1.71–19.29). Every 0.10 FFR units decrease in the coronaries was associated with 56% risk reduction of graft failure (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.59). FFR cut-off to predict graft failure was 0.79. Conclusion: Surgical grafting of coronaries with functionally nonsignificant stenoses was associated with higher risk of graft failure.
2022
coronary artery bypass surgery; fractional flow reserve; graft patency
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Influence of fractional flow reserve on grafts patency. Systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis / G. Toth, G.; Collet, C.; Langhoff Thuesen, A.; Mizukami, T.; Casselman, F.; Riber, L. P.; Van Praet, F.; Junker, A.; Nagumo, S.; De Bruyne, B.; Okkels Jensen, L.; Barbato, E.. - In: CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS. - ISSN 1522-1946. - 99:3(2022), pp. 730-735. [10.1002/ccd.29864]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Toht_Influence-of-fractional_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 250.97 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
250.97 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1699870
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact