Unlabelled: Knee PJIs represent one of the most important complications after joint replacement surgery. If the prerequisites for implant retention do not subsist, the surgical treatment of these conditions is performed using one-stage and two-stage revision techniques. In this study, an implemented two-stage revision technique was performed, adopting antibiotic calcium sulfate beads and tumor-like debridement guided by methylene blue, such as described for the DAPRI technique. The aim of the present study is to compare the implemented two-stage revision technique with the standard technique in order to assess its effectiveness. Methods: Twenty patients affected by knee PJIs were prospectively enrolled in the study and underwent an implemented two-stage revision technique (Group A). Data collected and clinical results were compared with a matched control group treated with a standard two-stage technique (Group B). For each patient, the time of the reimplantation and length of antibiotic systemic therapy were recorded. Each patient underwent routine laboratory tests, including inflammatory markers. Results: In Group A and in Group B, inflammatory markers normalized at 6.5 ± 1.1. weeks and 11.1 ± 2.3 weeks, respectively (p < 0.05). Also, the difference in length of antibiotic therapy and time to reimplantation were significantly shorter in Group A (p < 0.05). No recurrence of infection was found in Group A at the last follow-up. Discussion: The implemented two-stage revision technique demonstrated a faster normalization of inflammatory markers, as well as a decrease in reimplantation time and duration of antibiotic therapy, compared to the traditional technique. The use of calcium sulfate antibiotic beads and tumor-like debridement seems to improve the results and reduce the time of healing. Conclusion: The implemented two-stage revision technique seems to improve the results and reduce the time of healing. This leads to a more rapid and less stressful course for the patient, as well as a reduction in health care costs.
A Modified Technique for Two-Stage Revision in Knee PJI Treatment / Iorio, Raffaele; Iannotti, Ferdinando; Previ, Leonardo; Viglietta, Edoardo; Gugliotta, Yuri; Corsetti, Federico; Fenucci, Simone; De Carli, Angelo; Indelli, Pier Francesco; Redler, Andrea. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 12:23(2023), pp. 1-10. [10.3390/jcm12237323]
A Modified Technique for Two-Stage Revision in Knee PJI Treatment
Iorio, Raffaele;Iannotti, Ferdinando;Previ, Leonardo;Viglietta, Edoardo;Gugliotta, Yuri;Corsetti, Federico;Fenucci, Simone;De Carli, Angelo;Redler, Andrea
2023
Abstract
Unlabelled: Knee PJIs represent one of the most important complications after joint replacement surgery. If the prerequisites for implant retention do not subsist, the surgical treatment of these conditions is performed using one-stage and two-stage revision techniques. In this study, an implemented two-stage revision technique was performed, adopting antibiotic calcium sulfate beads and tumor-like debridement guided by methylene blue, such as described for the DAPRI technique. The aim of the present study is to compare the implemented two-stage revision technique with the standard technique in order to assess its effectiveness. Methods: Twenty patients affected by knee PJIs were prospectively enrolled in the study and underwent an implemented two-stage revision technique (Group A). Data collected and clinical results were compared with a matched control group treated with a standard two-stage technique (Group B). For each patient, the time of the reimplantation and length of antibiotic systemic therapy were recorded. Each patient underwent routine laboratory tests, including inflammatory markers. Results: In Group A and in Group B, inflammatory markers normalized at 6.5 ± 1.1. weeks and 11.1 ± 2.3 weeks, respectively (p < 0.05). Also, the difference in length of antibiotic therapy and time to reimplantation were significantly shorter in Group A (p < 0.05). No recurrence of infection was found in Group A at the last follow-up. Discussion: The implemented two-stage revision technique demonstrated a faster normalization of inflammatory markers, as well as a decrease in reimplantation time and duration of antibiotic therapy, compared to the traditional technique. The use of calcium sulfate antibiotic beads and tumor-like debridement seems to improve the results and reduce the time of healing. Conclusion: The implemented two-stage revision technique seems to improve the results and reduce the time of healing. This leads to a more rapid and less stressful course for the patient, as well as a reduction in health care costs.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Iorio_Modified-Technique-for-Two-Stage_2023.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
257 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
257 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.