Introduction: Botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections represent the gold standard treatment for cervical dystonia (CD). Different types of BoNT have been used for the treatment of CD, but only two serotypes, BoNT type A (BoNT-A) and type B (BoNT-B), have been approved by regulatory agencies. Efficacy and safety of BoNT have been well documented by many short-term studies, but the longterm effects have been investigated only relatively recently.Areas covered: In the present review, we aimed to critically reappraise the existing evidence on the long-term efficacy and safety of BoNT treatment in CD. The examined studies mainly explored BoNT-A serotypes. Only a few studies examined the long-term effects of BoNT-B serotypes, and only one head-to-head comparison between BoNT-A and BoNT-B was found. BoNT was consistently reported to be an effective and safe treatment for CD patients, with good outcomes and a few adverse events in the long-term. However about a third of patients still drop out from the treatment during a long-term follow-up.Expert opinion: We conclude that BoNT is safe and effective in the long-term treatment of patients with CD. Additional studies are needed to further explore patients real-life experiences and perspectives to better understand the long-term outcomes and reasons for discontinuation of treatment.

Long-term efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin treatment for cervical dystonia: a critical reappraisal / Marsili, Luca; Bologna, Matteo; Jankovic, Joseph; Colosimo, Carlo. - In: EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY. - ISSN 1474-0338. - (2021).

Long-term efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin treatment for cervical dystonia: a critical reappraisal

Matteo Bologna;
2021

Abstract

Introduction: Botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections represent the gold standard treatment for cervical dystonia (CD). Different types of BoNT have been used for the treatment of CD, but only two serotypes, BoNT type A (BoNT-A) and type B (BoNT-B), have been approved by regulatory agencies. Efficacy and safety of BoNT have been well documented by many short-term studies, but the longterm effects have been investigated only relatively recently.Areas covered: In the present review, we aimed to critically reappraise the existing evidence on the long-term efficacy and safety of BoNT treatment in CD. The examined studies mainly explored BoNT-A serotypes. Only a few studies examined the long-term effects of BoNT-B serotypes, and only one head-to-head comparison between BoNT-A and BoNT-B was found. BoNT was consistently reported to be an effective and safe treatment for CD patients, with good outcomes and a few adverse events in the long-term. However about a third of patients still drop out from the treatment during a long-term follow-up.Expert opinion: We conclude that BoNT is safe and effective in the long-term treatment of patients with CD. Additional studies are needed to further explore patients real-life experiences and perspectives to better understand the long-term outcomes and reasons for discontinuation of treatment.
2021
Botulinum neurotoxin; cervical dystonia; efficacy; long-term treatment; safety.
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
Long-term efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin treatment for cervical dystonia: a critical reappraisal / Marsili, Luca; Bologna, Matteo; Jankovic, Joseph; Colosimo, Carlo. - In: EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY. - ISSN 1474-0338. - (2021).
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Marsili, Bologna, Jankovic, and Colosimo 2021.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Note: Marsili_Long-term efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin treatment_2021
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 984.27 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
984.27 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1695530
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact