Background: Higher social support protects people from developing mental disorders. Limited evidence is available on the mechanism through which social support plays this protective role. Objective: To investigate the stress-buffering process of social support on depressive symptoms using a novel longitudinal dynamic symptom network approach. Methods: A total of 4242 adult participants who completed the first two waves (from May to October 2020) of the International Covid Mental Health Survey were included in the study. Cross-lagged panel network modelling was used to estimate a longitudinal network of self-reported social support, loneliness and depressive symptoms. Standardised regression coefficients from regularised cross-lagged regressions were estimated as edge weights of the network. Findings: The results support a unidirectional protective effect of social support on key depressive symptoms, partly mediated through loneliness: A higher number of close confidants and accessible practical help was associated with decreased anhedonia (weight=-0.033) and negative self-appraisal symptoms (weight=-0.038). Support from others was also negatively associated with loneliness, which in turn associated with decreased depressed mood (weight=0.086) and negative self-appraisal (weight=0.077). We identified a greater number of direct relationships from social support to depressive symptoms among men compared with women. Also, the edge weights from social support to depression were generally stronger in the men's network. Conclusions: Reductions in negative self-appraisal might function as a bridge between social support and other depressive symptoms, and, thus, it may have amplified the protective effect of social support. Men appear to benefit more from social support than women. Clinical implications: Building community-based support networks to deliver practical support, and loneliness reduction components are critical for depression prevention interventions after stressful experiences.

Understanding the protective effect of social support on depression symptomatology from a longitudinal network perspective / Li, Gen; Li, Yifan; Lam, Agnes Iok Fong; Tang, Weiming; Seedat, Soraya; Barbui, Corrado; Papola, Davide; Panter-Brick, Catherine; Waerden, Judith van der; Bryant, Richard; Mittendorfer-Rutz, Ellenor; Gémes, Katalin; Purba, Fredrick D; Setyowibowo, Hari; Pinucci, Irene; Palantza, Christina; Acarturk, Ceren; Kurt, Gülşah; Tarsitani, Lorenzo; Morina, Naser; Burchert, Sebastian; Patanè, Martina; Quero, Soledad; Campos, Daniel; Huizink, Anja C; Fuhr, Daniela C; Spiller, Tobias; Sijbrandij, Marit; Hall, Brian J. - In: BMJ MENTAL HEALTH. - ISSN 2755-9734. - 26:1(2023). [10.1136/bmjment-2023-300802]

Understanding the protective effect of social support on depression symptomatology from a longitudinal network perspective

Pinucci, Irene;Tarsitani, Lorenzo;
2023

Abstract

Background: Higher social support protects people from developing mental disorders. Limited evidence is available on the mechanism through which social support plays this protective role. Objective: To investigate the stress-buffering process of social support on depressive symptoms using a novel longitudinal dynamic symptom network approach. Methods: A total of 4242 adult participants who completed the first two waves (from May to October 2020) of the International Covid Mental Health Survey were included in the study. Cross-lagged panel network modelling was used to estimate a longitudinal network of self-reported social support, loneliness and depressive symptoms. Standardised regression coefficients from regularised cross-lagged regressions were estimated as edge weights of the network. Findings: The results support a unidirectional protective effect of social support on key depressive symptoms, partly mediated through loneliness: A higher number of close confidants and accessible practical help was associated with decreased anhedonia (weight=-0.033) and negative self-appraisal symptoms (weight=-0.038). Support from others was also negatively associated with loneliness, which in turn associated with decreased depressed mood (weight=0.086) and negative self-appraisal (weight=0.077). We identified a greater number of direct relationships from social support to depressive symptoms among men compared with women. Also, the edge weights from social support to depression were generally stronger in the men's network. Conclusions: Reductions in negative self-appraisal might function as a bridge between social support and other depressive symptoms, and, thus, it may have amplified the protective effect of social support. Men appear to benefit more from social support than women. Clinical implications: Building community-based support networks to deliver practical support, and loneliness reduction components are critical for depression prevention interventions after stressful experiences.
2023
COVID-19; adult psychiatry; depression & mood disorders
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Understanding the protective effect of social support on depression symptomatology from a longitudinal network perspective / Li, Gen; Li, Yifan; Lam, Agnes Iok Fong; Tang, Weiming; Seedat, Soraya; Barbui, Corrado; Papola, Davide; Panter-Brick, Catherine; Waerden, Judith van der; Bryant, Richard; Mittendorfer-Rutz, Ellenor; Gémes, Katalin; Purba, Fredrick D; Setyowibowo, Hari; Pinucci, Irene; Palantza, Christina; Acarturk, Ceren; Kurt, Gülşah; Tarsitani, Lorenzo; Morina, Naser; Burchert, Sebastian; Patanè, Martina; Quero, Soledad; Campos, Daniel; Huizink, Anja C; Fuhr, Daniela C; Spiller, Tobias; Sijbrandij, Marit; Hall, Brian J. - In: BMJ MENTAL HEALTH. - ISSN 2755-9734. - 26:1(2023). [10.1136/bmjment-2023-300802]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Understanding.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Li_Understanding the protective effect_2023
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 806.04 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
806.04 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1695344
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact