INTRODUCTION: Several methods of transverse patellar and olecranon fixation have been described. This article compares biomechanical studies of various fixation methods using a newly developed scoring method. SOURCE OF DATA: The databases PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Google were searched for relevant studies. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Fixation hardware failure remains a problem. Various materials and fixation techniques have been tested to provide an improved fixation of transverse olecranon and patellar fractures. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: The difference in biomechanical testing setup between the studies makes it hard to compare different fixation techniques. GROWING POINTS: The newly developed grading method was proved to be unbiased and reliable; however, extra specifications need to be added at some criteria when adopting the scoring method. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Non-metallic constructs may provide an improvement to the currently used metallic tension band wiring technique; however, clinical research is required.
Biomechanical studies on transverse olecranon and patellar fractures: a systematic review with the development of a new scoring method / Traa, Wa; Oomen, Pj; den Hamer, A; Heusinkveld, Mh; Maffulli, Nicola. - In: BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN. - ISSN 0007-1420. - (2013), pp. 131-157.
Biomechanical studies on transverse olecranon and patellar fractures: a systematic review with the development of a new scoring method
MAFFULLI, Nicola
2013
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Several methods of transverse patellar and olecranon fixation have been described. This article compares biomechanical studies of various fixation methods using a newly developed scoring method. SOURCE OF DATA: The databases PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, Google Scholar and Google were searched for relevant studies. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Fixation hardware failure remains a problem. Various materials and fixation techniques have been tested to provide an improved fixation of transverse olecranon and patellar fractures. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: The difference in biomechanical testing setup between the studies makes it hard to compare different fixation techniques. GROWING POINTS: The newly developed grading method was proved to be unbiased and reliable; however, extra specifications need to be added at some criteria when adopting the scoring method. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Non-metallic constructs may provide an improvement to the currently used metallic tension band wiring technique; however, clinical research is required.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.