OBJECTIVE: To report the results of a longitudinal study on reconstruction of neglected Achilles tendon rupture using a free autologous gracilis tendon graft. DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-one patients underwent surgery for a neglected rupture of the Achilles tendon occurring between 65 days and 9 months before the operation. METHODS: All participants were prospectively followed up for 2 years, and final review was performed at 28.4 +/- 3.5 months from the operation. Functional (anthropometric measurements, isometric strength, return to activities) and clinical assessment was performed. RESULTS: No patients experienced any problems in the wound used to harvest the tendon of gracilis. Five patients were managed conservatively following a superficial infection of the Achilles tendon surgical wound. No patients developed a deep vein thrombosis or sustained a rerupture. All patients were able to walk on tiptoes, and no patient used a heel lift or walked with a visible limp. The maximum calf circumference remained significantly decreased in the operated leg at final review. The operated limb was significantly less strong than the nonoperated one. CONCLUSIONS: The management of neglected tears of the Achilles tendon by free gracilis tendon grafting is safe but technically demanding. It affords good recovery, even in patients with a neglected rupture of a duration of 9 months. These patients should be warned that they are at risk for postoperative complications, and that their ankle plantar flexion strength can remain reduced.

Free gracilis tendon graft in neglected tears of the achilles tendon / Maffulli, Nicola; Leadbetter, W. B.. - In: CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE. - ISSN 1050-642X. - (2005), pp. 56-61.

Free gracilis tendon graft in neglected tears of the achilles tendon

MAFFULLI, Nicola;
2005

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of a longitudinal study on reconstruction of neglected Achilles tendon rupture using a free autologous gracilis tendon graft. DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-one patients underwent surgery for a neglected rupture of the Achilles tendon occurring between 65 days and 9 months before the operation. METHODS: All participants were prospectively followed up for 2 years, and final review was performed at 28.4 +/- 3.5 months from the operation. Functional (anthropometric measurements, isometric strength, return to activities) and clinical assessment was performed. RESULTS: No patients experienced any problems in the wound used to harvest the tendon of gracilis. Five patients were managed conservatively following a superficial infection of the Achilles tendon surgical wound. No patients developed a deep vein thrombosis or sustained a rerupture. All patients were able to walk on tiptoes, and no patient used a heel lift or walked with a visible limp. The maximum calf circumference remained significantly decreased in the operated leg at final review. The operated limb was significantly less strong than the nonoperated one. CONCLUSIONS: The management of neglected tears of the Achilles tendon by free gracilis tendon grafting is safe but technically demanding. It affords good recovery, even in patients with a neglected rupture of a duration of 9 months. These patients should be warned that they are at risk for postoperative complications, and that their ankle plantar flexion strength can remain reduced.
2005
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Free gracilis tendon graft in neglected tears of the achilles tendon / Maffulli, Nicola; Leadbetter, W. B.. - In: CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE. - ISSN 1050-642X. - (2005), pp. 56-61.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1694505
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 99
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 84
social impact