Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is increasingly used in Regenerative Medicine. The concept of PRP as a natural source of signaling molecules with paracrine effects in different cells is the basis for the increased PRP application as treatment for sports injuries. PRP recapitulates the principal functions of the natural healing response in orchestrating cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and angiogenesis. After systematically searching the literature, we identified 21 trials for PRP injections in tendinopathy: 57% were uncontrolled trials and 1 cohort study in muscle. Leukocyte-PRP was used in 91.7% of tendons, of which 65.5% received 1 single injection. Given the lack of large controlled trials, it is clear that the effectiveness of conservative L-PRP treatments is not proven. The clinical evaluation of alternative formulations can be extremely informative. Other unexplored issues include activation, redosing, and concomitant longitudinal tenotomies. Limiting factors for the acceptance of PRP are the lack of evidence of obvious clinical improvement and reimbursement.

Platelet-rich Plasma for Muscle Injury and Tendinopathy / Andia, I; Maffulli, Nicola. - In: SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW. - ISSN 1062-8592. - (2013), pp. 191-198.

Platelet-rich Plasma for Muscle Injury and Tendinopathy

MAFFULLI, Nicola
2013

Abstract

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is increasingly used in Regenerative Medicine. The concept of PRP as a natural source of signaling molecules with paracrine effects in different cells is the basis for the increased PRP application as treatment for sports injuries. PRP recapitulates the principal functions of the natural healing response in orchestrating cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and angiogenesis. After systematically searching the literature, we identified 21 trials for PRP injections in tendinopathy: 57% were uncontrolled trials and 1 cohort study in muscle. Leukocyte-PRP was used in 91.7% of tendons, of which 65.5% received 1 single injection. Given the lack of large controlled trials, it is clear that the effectiveness of conservative L-PRP treatments is not proven. The clinical evaluation of alternative formulations can be extremely informative. Other unexplored issues include activation, redosing, and concomitant longitudinal tenotomies. Limiting factors for the acceptance of PRP are the lack of evidence of obvious clinical improvement and reimbursement.
2013
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Platelet-rich Plasma for Muscle Injury and Tendinopathy / Andia, I; Maffulli, Nicola. - In: SPORTS MEDICINE AND ARTHROSCOPY REVIEW. - ISSN 1062-8592. - (2013), pp. 191-198.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1694399
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 30
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 24
social impact