AimThis research was performed to evaluate the in vivo accuracy of flapless, computer-guided implant placement by comparing the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants. Materials and methods In this retrospective study the results from a 1-year follow-up of a single-cohort of 15 patients (30 implants) are reported. A 3D planning software was used to determine the correct placement, considering the bone volume, the functional and the aesthetic prosthetic result. CAD/CAM technology was used to turn the virtual plan into the surgical guide.Results The statistical analysis showed a mean radial deviation of the implant head of 0.3 mm (SD 0.21), a mean radial deviation of the implant apex of 0.58 mm (SD 0.33), a mean depth deviation of the implant head of 0.37 mm (SD 0.29), a mean depth deviation of the implant apex of 0.43 mm (SD 0.25) and a mean angular deviation of the long axis of 2.87° (SD 1.99); the mean actual translation between the planned and the placed implant was 0.66 mm (SD 0.35) at implant platform and 1.04 mm (SD 0.47) at apex.Conclusion Flapless and computer-guided implant placement proved to be a reliable clinical option for an accurate implant insertion.
Accuracy comparison between the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants with flapless fully-guided surgery: 1-year follow-up from a single-cohort retrospective study / Passarelli, P. C.; Ferro, M.; De Angelis, P.; Papi, P.; Piccirillo, G. B.; Desantis, V.; Papa, R.; Pompa, G.; D'Addona, A.. - In: JOURNAL OF OSSEOINTEGRATION. - ISSN 2036-413X. - 12:3(2020), pp. 229-235. [10.23805/JO.2020.12.03.2]
Accuracy comparison between the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants with flapless fully-guided surgery: 1-year follow-up from a single-cohort retrospective study
Papi P.;Pompa G.;D'Addona A.
2020
Abstract
AimThis research was performed to evaluate the in vivo accuracy of flapless, computer-guided implant placement by comparing the three-dimensional position of planned and placed implants. Materials and methods In this retrospective study the results from a 1-year follow-up of a single-cohort of 15 patients (30 implants) are reported. A 3D planning software was used to determine the correct placement, considering the bone volume, the functional and the aesthetic prosthetic result. CAD/CAM technology was used to turn the virtual plan into the surgical guide.Results The statistical analysis showed a mean radial deviation of the implant head of 0.3 mm (SD 0.21), a mean radial deviation of the implant apex of 0.58 mm (SD 0.33), a mean depth deviation of the implant head of 0.37 mm (SD 0.29), a mean depth deviation of the implant apex of 0.43 mm (SD 0.25) and a mean angular deviation of the long axis of 2.87° (SD 1.99); the mean actual translation between the planned and the placed implant was 0.66 mm (SD 0.35) at implant platform and 1.04 mm (SD 0.47) at apex.Conclusion Flapless and computer-guided implant placement proved to be a reliable clinical option for an accurate implant insertion.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Passarelli_Accuracy-comparison_2020.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.59 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.59 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.