This paper explores intellectual and social proximity among scholarly journals by using network fusion techniques. Similarities among journals are initially represented by means of a three-layer network based on co-citations, common authors and common editors. The information contained in the three layers is then combined by building a fused similarity network. The fusion consists in an unsupervised process that exploits the structural properties of the layers. Subsequently, partial distance correlations are adopted for measuring the contribution of each layer to the structure of the fused network. Finally, the community morphology of the fused network is explored by using modularity. In the three fields considered (i.e. economics, information and library sciences and statistics) the major contribution to the structure of the fused network arises from editors. This result suggests that the role of editors as gatekeepers of journals is the most relevant in defining the boundaries of scholarly communities. In information and library sciences and statistics, the clusters of journals reflect sub-field specializations. In economics, clusters of journals appear to be better interpreted in terms of alternative methodological approaches.

Similarity network fusion for scholarly journals / Baccini, F.; Barabesi, L.; Baccini, A.; Khelfaoui, M.; Gingras, Y.. - In: JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS. - ISSN 1751-1577. - 16:1(2022). [10.1016/j.joi.2021.101226]

Similarity network fusion for scholarly journals

Baccini F.
Formal Analysis
;
2022

Abstract

This paper explores intellectual and social proximity among scholarly journals by using network fusion techniques. Similarities among journals are initially represented by means of a three-layer network based on co-citations, common authors and common editors. The information contained in the three layers is then combined by building a fused similarity network. The fusion consists in an unsupervised process that exploits the structural properties of the layers. Subsequently, partial distance correlations are adopted for measuring the contribution of each layer to the structure of the fused network. Finally, the community morphology of the fused network is explored by using modularity. In the three fields considered (i.e. economics, information and library sciences and statistics) the major contribution to the structure of the fused network arises from editors. This result suggests that the role of editors as gatekeepers of journals is the most relevant in defining the boundaries of scholarly communities. In information and library sciences and statistics, the clusters of journals reflect sub-field specializations. In economics, clusters of journals appear to be better interpreted in terms of alternative methodological approaches.
2022
co-citation network; communities in networks; gatekeepers; generalized distance correlation; interlocking authorship network; interlocking editorship network; multilayer social networks; partial distance correlation; similarity network fusion
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Similarity network fusion for scholarly journals / Baccini, F.; Barabesi, L.; Baccini, A.; Khelfaoui, M.; Gingras, Y.. - In: JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS. - ISSN 1751-1577. - 16:1(2022). [10.1016/j.joi.2021.101226]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Baccini_Similarity_2022.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 3.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.51 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore
Baccini_preprint_Similarity_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101226
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore, precedente alla peer review)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 8.63 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
8.63 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1691409
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact