Background-Calcification is an important limitation after aortic root replacement. The aims were to compare the long-term degree and rate of calcification of homografts versus Medtronic freestyle aortic roots to determine the functional consequences and predictive factors.Methods and Results-One hundred sixty-six patients were prospectively randomized to undergo homograft versus freestyle total aortic root replacement. Of those, 98 patients underwent a total of 248 electron beam computed tomography studies at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 8 years. All patients underwent yearly clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. Calcium scores were measured using Agatston scoring. Mixed effects models demonstrate significantly higher calcium scores in homograft roots than freestyle at 1.5 years (P=0.02), 2 years (P=0.02), and 3 years (P=0.01), with a trend at 1 year (P=0.06) and 8 years (P=0.1). Homograft calcification occurs significantly faster than in freestyle prostheses between 6 months and 3 years after surgery (P=0.02). Calcification occurs at a similar rate thereafter up to 8 years (P=0.3). At 8 years, freedom from aortic valve dysfunction was lower in homografts than freestyle roots (P=0.06). Freedom from reoperation was 93 +/- 4% in the homograft group versus 100 +/- 0% in the freestyle group at 8 years (P=0.01). On multivariate analysis, redo surgery (P<0.001), smoking (P<0.01), atrial fibrillation (P=0.001), family history of coronary artery disease (P<0.01), and a degenerative etiology (P=0.02) were predictive of higher calcium scores.Conclusion-Homograft roots exhibit significantly higher calcium scores than freestyle roots because of faster early calcification. (Circulation. 2009; 120[suppl 1]: S269-S275.)
Rate of progression and functional significance of aortic root calcification after homograft versus freestyle aortic root replacement / El-Hamamsy, Ismail; Zaki, Mohamed; Stevens, Louis M; Clark, Lucy A; Rubens, Michael; Melina, Giovanni; Yacoub, Magdi H. - In: CIRCULATION. - ISSN 0009-7322. - 120:11 Suppl(2009), pp. 269-275. [10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.843748]
Rate of progression and functional significance of aortic root calcification after homograft versus freestyle aortic root replacement
Melina, Giovanni;
2009
Abstract
Background-Calcification is an important limitation after aortic root replacement. The aims were to compare the long-term degree and rate of calcification of homografts versus Medtronic freestyle aortic roots to determine the functional consequences and predictive factors.Methods and Results-One hundred sixty-six patients were prospectively randomized to undergo homograft versus freestyle total aortic root replacement. Of those, 98 patients underwent a total of 248 electron beam computed tomography studies at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, and 8 years. All patients underwent yearly clinical and echocardiographic follow-up. Calcium scores were measured using Agatston scoring. Mixed effects models demonstrate significantly higher calcium scores in homograft roots than freestyle at 1.5 years (P=0.02), 2 years (P=0.02), and 3 years (P=0.01), with a trend at 1 year (P=0.06) and 8 years (P=0.1). Homograft calcification occurs significantly faster than in freestyle prostheses between 6 months and 3 years after surgery (P=0.02). Calcification occurs at a similar rate thereafter up to 8 years (P=0.3). At 8 years, freedom from aortic valve dysfunction was lower in homografts than freestyle roots (P=0.06). Freedom from reoperation was 93 +/- 4% in the homograft group versus 100 +/- 0% in the freestyle group at 8 years (P=0.01). On multivariate analysis, redo surgery (P<0.001), smoking (P<0.01), atrial fibrillation (P=0.001), family history of coronary artery disease (P<0.01), and a degenerative etiology (P=0.02) were predictive of higher calcium scores.Conclusion-Homograft roots exhibit significantly higher calcium scores than freestyle roots because of faster early calcification. (Circulation. 2009; 120[suppl 1]: S269-S275.)| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
El-Hamamsy_Rate-of-progression_2009.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
306.76 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
306.76 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


