Ageism is a social issue of growing concern; ageist beliefs can shape the individual and collective experience of aging. The present study aimed to explore positive and negative ageism in young adults (YA) (18-30 years) and adults (AD) (31-60 years) and their relationship with epistemic trust, psychological distress, and psychological well-being. 301 Italian adult participants completed an online survey that included the following self-report questionnaires: attitudes towards older people scale, epistemic trust, mistrust and credulity questionnaire, depression anxiety stress scale-21, and Warwick-Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale. Negative ageism was significantly higher in YA compared to AD; on the contrary, AD presented more positive ageism than YA. When considering the entire sample, negative ageism was correlated with various dimensions of psychological distress and epistemic trust. A mediation model revealed that epistemic mistrust fully mediated the relationship between age and negative ageism, suggesting that changes in ageist beliefs that seem to occur with age are mediated by a mistrustful epistemic stance. Future research should focus on further exploring the link between epistemic trust, mental health, and holding ageist beliefs. The results are also discussed in terms of their implications for the treatment of older patients.

Negative and positive ageism in an Italian sample. How ageist beliefs relate to epistemic trust, psychological distress, and well-being / FIORINI BINCOLETTO, Alice; Zanini, Ludovica; Spitoni, Grazia Fernanda; Lingiardi, Vittorio. - In: RESEARCH IN PSYCHOTHERAPY. - ISSN 2239-8031. - 26:(2023). [10.4081/ripppo.2023.676]

Negative and positive ageism in an Italian sample. How ageist beliefs relate to epistemic trust, psychological distress, and well-being

Alice Fiorini Bincoletto
Primo
;
Ludovica Zanini
Secondo
;
Grazia Fernanda Spitoni
Penultimo
;
Vittorio Lingiardi
Ultimo
2023

Abstract

Ageism is a social issue of growing concern; ageist beliefs can shape the individual and collective experience of aging. The present study aimed to explore positive and negative ageism in young adults (YA) (18-30 years) and adults (AD) (31-60 years) and their relationship with epistemic trust, psychological distress, and psychological well-being. 301 Italian adult participants completed an online survey that included the following self-report questionnaires: attitudes towards older people scale, epistemic trust, mistrust and credulity questionnaire, depression anxiety stress scale-21, and Warwick-Edinburgh mental wellbeing scale. Negative ageism was significantly higher in YA compared to AD; on the contrary, AD presented more positive ageism than YA. When considering the entire sample, negative ageism was correlated with various dimensions of psychological distress and epistemic trust. A mediation model revealed that epistemic mistrust fully mediated the relationship between age and negative ageism, suggesting that changes in ageist beliefs that seem to occur with age are mediated by a mistrustful epistemic stance. Future research should focus on further exploring the link between epistemic trust, mental health, and holding ageist beliefs. The results are also discussed in terms of their implications for the treatment of older patients.
2023
ageism; epistemic trust; epistemic mistrust; epistemic credulity; psychological well-being.
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Negative and positive ageism in an Italian sample. How ageist beliefs relate to epistemic trust, psychological distress, and well-being / FIORINI BINCOLETTO, Alice; Zanini, Ludovica; Spitoni, Grazia Fernanda; Lingiardi, Vittorio. - In: RESEARCH IN PSYCHOTHERAPY. - ISSN 2239-8031. - 26:(2023). [10.4081/ripppo.2023.676]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1690305
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact