The use of robotics in rehabilitating motor functions has increased exponentially in recent decades. One of the most used robotic tools is undoubtedly the Armeo® Power, which has proved to have excellent qualities as a rehabilitation tool. However, none of these studies has investigated the ability of Armeo® Power to assess the upper limb by correlating the data resulting from the software with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The present study aims to evaluate the variability between the standardized PROMs, Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS), Fugl–Meyer upper limb assessment (FMA-UL), and the Armeo® Power measurements. To evaluate the correlation between SULCS and FMA-UL and the strength and joint assessments obtained with the Armeo® Power, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used. A total of 102 stroke survivors were included in this cross-sectional study, and all participants finished the study. The results showed many statistically significant correlations between PROM items and Armeo® Power data. In conclusion, from this study, it can be stated that Armeo® Power, based on the analysis of the data collected, can be an objective evaluation tool, which can be combined with the operator-employee traditional evaluation techniques, especially when compared to a patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Assessment Capacity of the Armeo® Power: Cross-Sectional Study / Galeoto, Giovanni; Berardi, Anna; Mangone, Massimiliano; Tufo, Leonardo; Silvani, Martina; González-Bernal, Jerónimo; Seco-Calvo, Jesús. - In: TECHNOLOGIES. - ISSN 2227-7080. - 11:5(2023), p. 125. [10.3390/technologies11050125]

Assessment Capacity of the Armeo® Power: Cross-Sectional Study

Galeoto, Giovanni;Berardi, Anna
;
Mangone, Massimiliano;Silvani, Martina;
2023

Abstract

The use of robotics in rehabilitating motor functions has increased exponentially in recent decades. One of the most used robotic tools is undoubtedly the Armeo® Power, which has proved to have excellent qualities as a rehabilitation tool. However, none of these studies has investigated the ability of Armeo® Power to assess the upper limb by correlating the data resulting from the software with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The present study aims to evaluate the variability between the standardized PROMs, Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale (SULCS), Fugl–Meyer upper limb assessment (FMA-UL), and the Armeo® Power measurements. To evaluate the correlation between SULCS and FMA-UL and the strength and joint assessments obtained with the Armeo® Power, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used. A total of 102 stroke survivors were included in this cross-sectional study, and all participants finished the study. The results showed many statistically significant correlations between PROM items and Armeo® Power data. In conclusion, from this study, it can be stated that Armeo® Power, based on the analysis of the data collected, can be an objective evaluation tool, which can be combined with the operator-employee traditional evaluation techniques, especially when compared to a patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
2023
robotics; upper limb; stroke; Armeo; rehabilitation; validity
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Assessment Capacity of the Armeo® Power: Cross-Sectional Study / Galeoto, Giovanni; Berardi, Anna; Mangone, Massimiliano; Tufo, Leonardo; Silvani, Martina; González-Bernal, Jerónimo; Seco-Calvo, Jesús. - In: TECHNOLOGIES. - ISSN 2227-7080. - 11:5(2023), p. 125. [10.3390/technologies11050125]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Assessment_Capacity_of_the_ArmeoR_Power_Cross-Sect.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Galeoto_Assessment Capacity_2023
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 293.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
293.07 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1689721
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact