Benvenuto Terracini was not strictly speaking a philosopher of language, but he was among the very few linguists of the early 20th century to tackle the methodological problems of his discipline. His reflections therefore represent a significant step in the theoretical debate on language in Italy in the early 20th century. The essay focuses in particular on the connection between linguistic and philosophical historicism, analysing the different influence of Croce and Cassirer on his work.
Storicismo e ricerca linguistica. La riflessione di Benvenuto Terracini / Tani, Ilaria. - In: FILOSOFIA ITALIANA. - ISSN 2611-3392. - 2:XVII (2022)(2023), pp. 73-93. [10.53136/97912218089715]
Storicismo e ricerca linguistica. La riflessione di Benvenuto Terracini
Ilaria Tani
2023
Abstract
Benvenuto Terracini was not strictly speaking a philosopher of language, but he was among the very few linguists of the early 20th century to tackle the methodological problems of his discipline. His reflections therefore represent a significant step in the theoretical debate on language in Italy in the early 20th century. The essay focuses in particular on the connection between linguistic and philosophical historicism, analysing the different influence of Croce and Cassirer on his work.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Tani_Storicismo-e-ricerca-linguistica_2023.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
221.39 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
221.39 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.