Objectives: Postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be initiated intraoperatively or postoperatively based on indications, settings, patient profile, and conditions. The topic of implantation timing only recently gained attention from the clinical community. We compare patient characteristics as well as in-hospital and long-term survival between intraoperative and postoperative ECMO. Methods: The retrospective, multicenter, observational Postcardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support (PELS-1) study includes adults who required ECMO due to postcardiotomy shock between 2000 and 2020. We compared patients who received ECMO in the operating theater (intraoperative) with those in the intensive care unit (postoperative) on in-hospital and postdischarge outcomes. Results: We studied 2003 patients (women: 41.1%; median age: 65 years; interquartile range [IQR], 55.0-72.0). Intraoperative ECMO patients (n = 1287) compared with postoperative ECMO patients (n = 716) had worse preoperative risk profiles. Cardiogenic shock (45.3%), right ventricular failure (15.9%), and cardiac arrest (14.3%) were the main indications for postoperative ECMO initiation, with cannulation occurring after (median) 1 day (IQR, 1-3 days). Compared with intraoperative application, patients who received postoperative ECMO showed more complications, cardiac reoperations (intraoperative: 19.7%; postoperative: 24.8%, P = .011), percutaneous coronary interventions (intraoperative: 1.8%; postoperative: 3.6%, P = .026), and had greater in-hospital mortality (intraoperative: 57.5%; postoperative: 64.5%, P = .002). Among hospital survivors, ECMO duration was shorter after intraoperative ECMO (median, 104; IQR, 67.8-164.2 hours) compared with postoperative ECMO (median, 139.7; IQR, 95.8-192 hours, P < .001), whereas postdischarge long-term survival was similar between the 2 groups (P = .86). Conclusions: Intraoperative and postoperative ECMO implantations are associated with different patient characteristics and outcomes, with greater complications and in-hospital mortality after postoperative ECMO. Strategies to identify the optimal location and timing of postcardiotomy ECMO in relation to specific patient characteristics are warranted to optimize in-hospital outcomes.

The importance of timing in postcardiotomy venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A descriptive multicenter observational study / Mariani, Silvia; Wang, I-Wen; van Bussel, Bas C T; Heuts, Samuel; Wiedemann, Dominik; Saeed, Diyar; van der Horst, Iwan C C; Pozzi, Matteo; Loforte, Antonio; Boeken, Udo; Samalavicius, Robertas; Bounader, Karl; Hou, Xiaotong; Bunge, Jeroen J H; Buscher, Hergen; Salazar, Leonardo; Meyns, Bart; Herr, Daniel; Matteucci, Sacha; Sponga, Sandro; Ramanathan, Kollengode; Russo, Claudio; Formica, Francesco; Sakiyalak, Pranya; Fiore, Antonio; Camboni, Daniele; Raffa, Giuseppe Maria; Diaz, Rodrigo; Jung, Jae-Seung; Belohlavek, Jan; Pellegrino, Vin; Bianchi, Giacomo; Pettinari, Matteo; Barbone, Alessandro; Garcia, José P; Shekar, Kiran; Whitman, Glenn; Lorusso, Roberto. - In: THE JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY. - ISSN 1097-685X. - (2023). [10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.04.042]

The importance of timing in postcardiotomy venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A descriptive multicenter observational study

Fiore, Antonio;
2023

Abstract

Objectives: Postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be initiated intraoperatively or postoperatively based on indications, settings, patient profile, and conditions. The topic of implantation timing only recently gained attention from the clinical community. We compare patient characteristics as well as in-hospital and long-term survival between intraoperative and postoperative ECMO. Methods: The retrospective, multicenter, observational Postcardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support (PELS-1) study includes adults who required ECMO due to postcardiotomy shock between 2000 and 2020. We compared patients who received ECMO in the operating theater (intraoperative) with those in the intensive care unit (postoperative) on in-hospital and postdischarge outcomes. Results: We studied 2003 patients (women: 41.1%; median age: 65 years; interquartile range [IQR], 55.0-72.0). Intraoperative ECMO patients (n = 1287) compared with postoperative ECMO patients (n = 716) had worse preoperative risk profiles. Cardiogenic shock (45.3%), right ventricular failure (15.9%), and cardiac arrest (14.3%) were the main indications for postoperative ECMO initiation, with cannulation occurring after (median) 1 day (IQR, 1-3 days). Compared with intraoperative application, patients who received postoperative ECMO showed more complications, cardiac reoperations (intraoperative: 19.7%; postoperative: 24.8%, P = .011), percutaneous coronary interventions (intraoperative: 1.8%; postoperative: 3.6%, P = .026), and had greater in-hospital mortality (intraoperative: 57.5%; postoperative: 64.5%, P = .002). Among hospital survivors, ECMO duration was shorter after intraoperative ECMO (median, 104; IQR, 67.8-164.2 hours) compared with postoperative ECMO (median, 139.7; IQR, 95.8-192 hours, P < .001), whereas postdischarge long-term survival was similar between the 2 groups (P = .86). Conclusions: Intraoperative and postoperative ECMO implantations are associated with different patient characteristics and outcomes, with greater complications and in-hospital mortality after postoperative ECMO. Strategies to identify the optimal location and timing of postcardiotomy ECMO in relation to specific patient characteristics are warranted to optimize in-hospital outcomes.
2023
acute heart failure; cardiac surgery; extracorporeal life support; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; mechanical circulatory support; postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The importance of timing in postcardiotomy venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A descriptive multicenter observational study / Mariani, Silvia; Wang, I-Wen; van Bussel, Bas C T; Heuts, Samuel; Wiedemann, Dominik; Saeed, Diyar; van der Horst, Iwan C C; Pozzi, Matteo; Loforte, Antonio; Boeken, Udo; Samalavicius, Robertas; Bounader, Karl; Hou, Xiaotong; Bunge, Jeroen J H; Buscher, Hergen; Salazar, Leonardo; Meyns, Bart; Herr, Daniel; Matteucci, Sacha; Sponga, Sandro; Ramanathan, Kollengode; Russo, Claudio; Formica, Francesco; Sakiyalak, Pranya; Fiore, Antonio; Camboni, Daniele; Raffa, Giuseppe Maria; Diaz, Rodrigo; Jung, Jae-Seung; Belohlavek, Jan; Pellegrino, Vin; Bianchi, Giacomo; Pettinari, Matteo; Barbone, Alessandro; Garcia, José P; Shekar, Kiran; Whitman, Glenn; Lorusso, Roberto. - In: THE JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY. - ISSN 1097-685X. - (2023). [10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.04.042]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1689367
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact