This paper conducts a comparative evaluation on typical critical plane criteria, including Fatemi-Socie, Wang-Brown, modified Smith-Watson-Topper (MSWT) and proposed modified generalized strain energy (MGSE) criteria for multiaxial fatigue analysis of ductile/brittle materials. Experimental datasets of four materials under uniaxial tension, torsion and proportional/non-proportional multiaxial loadings are introduced for model comparison. This study results indicate that criteria with additional material constants yield robust life predictions for different materials. Moreover, the criteria with shear and uniaxial fatigue properties are respectively suitable for ductile and brittle materials, particularly the MGSE superior to others for ductile/brittle materials while MSWT only for brittle materials. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd
Evaluation and comparison of critical plane criteria for multiaxial fatigue analysis of ductile and brittle materials / Zhu, S. -P.; Yu, Z. -Y.; Correia, J.; De Jesus, A.; Berto, F.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE. - ISSN 0142-1123. - 112:(2018), pp. 279-288. [10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.03.028]
Evaluation and comparison of critical plane criteria for multiaxial fatigue analysis of ductile and brittle materials
De Jesus A.;Berto F.
2018
Abstract
This paper conducts a comparative evaluation on typical critical plane criteria, including Fatemi-Socie, Wang-Brown, modified Smith-Watson-Topper (MSWT) and proposed modified generalized strain energy (MGSE) criteria for multiaxial fatigue analysis of ductile/brittle materials. Experimental datasets of four materials under uniaxial tension, torsion and proportional/non-proportional multiaxial loadings are introduced for model comparison. This study results indicate that criteria with additional material constants yield robust life predictions for different materials. Moreover, the criteria with shear and uniaxial fatigue properties are respectively suitable for ductile and brittle materials, particularly the MGSE superior to others for ductile/brittle materials while MSWT only for brittle materials. © 2018 Elsevier LtdFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Zhu_Evaluation-comparison-critical_2018.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
3.97 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.97 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.