Lithium salts are widely used clinically, mainly for treatment of bipolar disorder, in which it is highly effective. Various preparations have been developed and tested, including older immediate-release (IR) forms of lithium carbonate and other salts and formulations with slow-release (SR) properties, developed in hopes of increasing the tolerability of lithium treatment, adherence to its use, and possibly its efficacy. Systematic reviews of head-to-head comparisons of pharmacological and clinical properties of such preparations are lacking. Accordingly, we systematically reviewed clinical studies of both IR and SR formulations of lithium salts, seeking to compare their pharmacokinetic properties, adverse effects, clinical tolerability, and clinical effectiveness. Very few such comparative studies were identified and they are highly heterogeneous in design and findings. In 11 included reports, SR formulations appeared to be better tolerated and possibly to be associated with greater adherence to treatment. Studies of comparative clinical efficacy are lacking. Despite decades of use of various lithium salts, systematic comparisons of the pharmacological and clinical properties of IR vs. SR preparations remain rare and to be deepened, though with suggestive superiority of SR salts.
Comparison of immediate and sustained release formulations of lithium salts / Pompili, Maurizio; Magistri, Carlo; Mellini, Cristiano; Sarli, Giuseppe; Baldessarini, Ross J. - In: INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY. - ISSN 0954-0261. - 34:7-8(2022), pp. 753-759. [10.1080/09540261.2022.2122706]
Comparison of immediate and sustained release formulations of lithium salts
Pompili, Maurizio
;Magistri, Carlo;Mellini, Cristiano;
2022
Abstract
Lithium salts are widely used clinically, mainly for treatment of bipolar disorder, in which it is highly effective. Various preparations have been developed and tested, including older immediate-release (IR) forms of lithium carbonate and other salts and formulations with slow-release (SR) properties, developed in hopes of increasing the tolerability of lithium treatment, adherence to its use, and possibly its efficacy. Systematic reviews of head-to-head comparisons of pharmacological and clinical properties of such preparations are lacking. Accordingly, we systematically reviewed clinical studies of both IR and SR formulations of lithium salts, seeking to compare their pharmacokinetic properties, adverse effects, clinical tolerability, and clinical effectiveness. Very few such comparative studies were identified and they are highly heterogeneous in design and findings. In 11 included reports, SR formulations appeared to be better tolerated and possibly to be associated with greater adherence to treatment. Studies of comparative clinical efficacy are lacking. Despite decades of use of various lithium salts, systematic comparisons of the pharmacological and clinical properties of IR vs. SR preparations remain rare and to be deepened, though with suggestive superiority of SR salts.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Pompili_Comparison-ofimmediate-andsustained-release-formulations-of lithium-salts_2022.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.06 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.06 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.