The present work proposes that the relation of employment conditions (i.e., unemployment and precarious work vs. permanent employment) with participation in collective action and satisfaction with life depends on the extent to which acceptance of inequality is high or low, and that collective action mediates the association between employment conditions and satisfaction with life. We analyzed data from the European Social Survey (Round 8, 2016) and found that (1) when acceptance of inequality is low (vs. high), employment disadvantage is positively related to engagement in collective action and, in turn, satisfaction with life; (2) employment disadvantage is negatively related to satisfaction with life, and this relation increases when acceptance of inequality is low (vs. high). This study generates findings of interest to inequality researchers by showing the relevance of acceptance of inequality for collective action and life satisfaction in the context of employment.
Employment, collective action, and satisfaction: the moderating role of acceptance of inequality / De Cristofaro, V.; Pellegrini, V.; Salvati, M.; Leone, L.; Giacomantonio, M.. - In: ANALYSES OF SOCIAL ISSUES AND PUBLIC POLICY. - ISSN 1530-2415. - 23:2(2023), pp. 474-494. [10.1111/asap.12356]
Employment, collective action, and satisfaction: the moderating role of acceptance of inequality
Pellegrini, V.Secondo
Methodology
;Leone, L.Penultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
;Giacomantonio, M.Ultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
2023
Abstract
The present work proposes that the relation of employment conditions (i.e., unemployment and precarious work vs. permanent employment) with participation in collective action and satisfaction with life depends on the extent to which acceptance of inequality is high or low, and that collective action mediates the association between employment conditions and satisfaction with life. We analyzed data from the European Social Survey (Round 8, 2016) and found that (1) when acceptance of inequality is low (vs. high), employment disadvantage is positively related to engagement in collective action and, in turn, satisfaction with life; (2) employment disadvantage is negatively related to satisfaction with life, and this relation increases when acceptance of inequality is low (vs. high). This study generates findings of interest to inequality researchers by showing the relevance of acceptance of inequality for collective action and life satisfaction in the context of employment.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.