In this work we introduce a new class of mechanisms composed of a traditional Generalized Second Price (GSP) auction, and a fair division scheme in order to achieve some desired level of fairness between groups of Bayesian strategic advertisers. We propose two mechanisms, beta-Fair GSP and GSP-EFX, that compose GSP with, respectively, an envy-free up to one item, and an envy-free up to any item fair division scheme. The payments of GSP are adjusted in order to compensate advertisers that suffer a loss of efficiency due the fair division stage. We investigate the strategic learning implications of the deployment of sponsored search auction mechanisms that obey to such fairness criteria. We prove that, for both mechanisms, if bidders play so as to minimize their external regret they are guaranteed to reach an equilibrium with good social welfare. We also prove that the mechanisms are budget balanced, so that the payments charged by the traditional GSP mechanism are a good proxy of the total compensation offered to the advertisers. Finally, we evaluate the quality of the allocations through experiments on real-world data.

Fair Equilibria in Sponsored Search Auctions: The Advertisers’ Perspective / Birmpas, Georgios; Celli, Andrea; Colini-Baldeschi, Riccardo; Leonardi, Stefano. - (2022), pp. 95-101. (Intervento presentato al convegno International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence tenutosi a Vienna) [10.24963/ijcai.2022/14].

Fair Equilibria in Sponsored Search Auctions: The Advertisers’ Perspective

Birmpas, Georgios;Celli, Andrea;Colini-Baldeschi, Riccardo;Leonardi, Stefano
2022

Abstract

In this work we introduce a new class of mechanisms composed of a traditional Generalized Second Price (GSP) auction, and a fair division scheme in order to achieve some desired level of fairness between groups of Bayesian strategic advertisers. We propose two mechanisms, beta-Fair GSP and GSP-EFX, that compose GSP with, respectively, an envy-free up to one item, and an envy-free up to any item fair division scheme. The payments of GSP are adjusted in order to compensate advertisers that suffer a loss of efficiency due the fair division stage. We investigate the strategic learning implications of the deployment of sponsored search auction mechanisms that obey to such fairness criteria. We prove that, for both mechanisms, if bidders play so as to minimize their external regret they are guaranteed to reach an equilibrium with good social welfare. We also prove that the mechanisms are budget balanced, so that the payments charged by the traditional GSP mechanism are a good proxy of the total compensation offered to the advertisers. Finally, we evaluate the quality of the allocations through experiments on real-world data.
2022
International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
Agent-based and Multi-agent Systems: Mechanism Design Agent-based and Multi-agent Systems: Algorithmic Game Theory
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Fair Equilibria in Sponsored Search Auctions: The Advertisers’ Perspective / Birmpas, Georgios; Celli, Andrea; Colini-Baldeschi, Riccardo; Leonardi, Stefano. - (2022), pp. 95-101. (Intervento presentato al convegno International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence tenutosi a Vienna) [10.24963/ijcai.2022/14].
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1685503
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact