Manuscripts Bamberg, Staastbibl., Patr. 61 (B) and Paris, Bibl. Mazarine, 660 (M) are among the most important witnesses of Cassiodorus’ 'Institutiones'. B is famous for its origin in southern Italy (probably Montecassino), towards the end of the VIIIth century. Much less in known about M, for which scholars have proposed an origin in northern Italy (possibly Nonantola) during the IXth century, and whose textual connection with B is much debated. In his 1937 edition of the 'Institutiones', Roger A. B. Mynors proved M to be a 'codex descriptus' of B, but a few years later Edward Rand raised some objections in this regard, because of the absence in M of some of the Bambergensis’ mistakes and later corrections. This paper presents the results of a new and complete collation of the two witnesses, discussing the «delicate matter» – as Rand defined it – of their mutual relationship from both an ecdotic and an historical point of view. This will also allow a wider consideration of the value of ‘physical evidences’ vs. textual criteria for the identification of a 'codex descriptus'.

Padri e figli a confronto: I manoscritti Bambergense Patr. 61 e Mazarine 660 delle 'Institutiones' di Cassiodoro / Morresi, Ilaria. - In: FILOLOGIA MEDIOLATINA. - ISSN 1124-0008. - 30(2023), pp. 325-352.

Padri e figli a confronto: I manoscritti Bambergense Patr. 61 e Mazarine 660 delle 'Institutiones' di Cassiodoro

ILARIA MORRESI
2023

Abstract

Manuscripts Bamberg, Staastbibl., Patr. 61 (B) and Paris, Bibl. Mazarine, 660 (M) are among the most important witnesses of Cassiodorus’ 'Institutiones'. B is famous for its origin in southern Italy (probably Montecassino), towards the end of the VIIIth century. Much less in known about M, for which scholars have proposed an origin in northern Italy (possibly Nonantola) during the IXth century, and whose textual connection with B is much debated. In his 1937 edition of the 'Institutiones', Roger A. B. Mynors proved M to be a 'codex descriptus' of B, but a few years later Edward Rand raised some objections in this regard, because of the absence in M of some of the Bambergensis’ mistakes and later corrections. This paper presents the results of a new and complete collation of the two witnesses, discussing the «delicate matter» – as Rand defined it – of their mutual relationship from both an ecdotic and an historical point of view. This will also allow a wider consideration of the value of ‘physical evidences’ vs. textual criteria for the identification of a 'codex descriptus'.
2023
Cassiodoro; Institutiones; tradizione manoscritta; codex descriptus; stemmatica
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Padri e figli a confronto: I manoscritti Bambergense Patr. 61 e Mazarine 660 delle 'Institutiones' di Cassiodoro / Morresi, Ilaria. - In: FILOLOGIA MEDIOLATINA. - ISSN 1124-0008. - 30(2023), pp. 325-352.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1684355
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact