Framing of the research: A very recent development in corporate governance studies concerns how to integrate environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators in executive compensation plans. The debate is no longer about whether the use of ESG indicators in executive compensation makes sense, but about how to utilize them in the most effective way. Purpose of the paper: Based on the neo-institutional theory (NIT) and on the substantive vs merely symbolic inclusion of ESG criteria in executive compensation plans, we describe the spread and frequency (of the use) of ESG indicators in chief executive officers’ (CEOs’) compensation plans devised by Italian listed companies, verifying, at the same time, the quantitative diversification of such indicators and the progress made by selected companies in recent years. In addition, our aim is to provide configurations that enable firms to give a higher weight to ESG indicators in their compensation plans. Methodology: Our sample covers all Italian listed companies on the Financial Times Stock Exchange Milano Indice di Borsa (FTSE MIB) during the last five years (2017-2021). To analyse data and define the specific configurations mentioned above, we employed fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (Fs/QCA). Results: In an overall context that shows relevant progress in the adoption of ESG indicators as part of compensation plan metrics, three configurations emerged which achieve the highest ESG weights and correspond, according to our interpretation, to different levels of substantiality in ESG implementation. Research limitations: First, we did not consider other conditions that could have helped to identify cases of symbolic adoption. Second, we have not examined the type of ESG indicators that firms adopt. Managerial implications: Sustainability-oriented investors might look for signs in the bundle of characteristics of the remuneration policy to infer whether it corresponds to a more or less substantial implementation of the ESG activities. Originality of the paper: To the best of our knowledge, our database is the first longitudinal database of ESG indicators in CEOs’ compensation plans.
Substance and symbol in ESG-linked executive compensation. Evidence from Italian listed companies / Cucari, Nicola; D'Angelo, Eugenio; Sardanelli, Domenico; Surace, Francesco; DI SILVESTRE, Simone. - In: SINERGIE. - ISSN 0393-5108. - 41:2(2023), pp. 103-127. [10.7433/s121.2023.06]
Substance and symbol in ESG-linked executive compensation. Evidence from Italian listed companies
CUCARI, NICOLA
;D'ANGELO, EUGENIO;SARDANELLI, DOMENICO;SURACE, FRANCESCO;
2023
Abstract
Framing of the research: A very recent development in corporate governance studies concerns how to integrate environmental, social and governance (ESG) indicators in executive compensation plans. The debate is no longer about whether the use of ESG indicators in executive compensation makes sense, but about how to utilize them in the most effective way. Purpose of the paper: Based on the neo-institutional theory (NIT) and on the substantive vs merely symbolic inclusion of ESG criteria in executive compensation plans, we describe the spread and frequency (of the use) of ESG indicators in chief executive officers’ (CEOs’) compensation plans devised by Italian listed companies, verifying, at the same time, the quantitative diversification of such indicators and the progress made by selected companies in recent years. In addition, our aim is to provide configurations that enable firms to give a higher weight to ESG indicators in their compensation plans. Methodology: Our sample covers all Italian listed companies on the Financial Times Stock Exchange Milano Indice di Borsa (FTSE MIB) during the last five years (2017-2021). To analyse data and define the specific configurations mentioned above, we employed fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (Fs/QCA). Results: In an overall context that shows relevant progress in the adoption of ESG indicators as part of compensation plan metrics, three configurations emerged which achieve the highest ESG weights and correspond, according to our interpretation, to different levels of substantiality in ESG implementation. Research limitations: First, we did not consider other conditions that could have helped to identify cases of symbolic adoption. Second, we have not examined the type of ESG indicators that firms adopt. Managerial implications: Sustainability-oriented investors might look for signs in the bundle of characteristics of the remuneration policy to infer whether it corresponds to a more or less substantial implementation of the ESG activities. Originality of the paper: To the best of our knowledge, our database is the first longitudinal database of ESG indicators in CEOs’ compensation plans.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Cucari_Substance-and-symbol_2023.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
355 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
355 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.