A renewed philosophy for the ultimate limit state design of pile groups is based on the adoption of multiaxial strength envelopes. In this view, the present study proposes a limit analysis-based framework providing high-fidelity predictions for the generalised failure loads of piled foundations. This is accomplished through: (i) the development of an upper-bound solution that better approximates the exact solution compared to existing ones; and (ii) the integration of a recently developed lower-bound solution with a formulation accounting for pile-soil-pile interaction at failure. The comparison between these complementary methods proved to be satisfactory on many load combinations. The proposed framework is readily applicable in design, at a minimal computational effort, as well as in a more refined assessment of structures, as it provides the ultimate limit state surface for a plasticity-based macroelement representation of deep foundations. The framework is used herein to investigate the horizontal efficiency of a well-documented piled foundation, and theoretical predictions are compared with results of fully coupled numerical analyses. The resulting strength envelopes point out the effect of the vertical load on the mutual interaction between piles, which is an indicator of the contribution of the pile’s axial capacity in the activation of multiaxial failure modes.

RIGOROUS LOWER AND UPPER BOUNDS FOR THE GENERALISED FAILURE LOADS OF PILE GROUPS / Potini, F.; Gorini, D. N.; Conti, C.. - In: GÉOTECHNIQUE LETTERS. - ISSN 2045-2543. - 13:2(2023), pp. 1-7. [10.1680/jgele.22.00138]

RIGOROUS LOWER AND UPPER BOUNDS FOR THE GENERALISED FAILURE LOADS OF PILE GROUPS

Gorini D. N.
Secondo
;
2023

Abstract

A renewed philosophy for the ultimate limit state design of pile groups is based on the adoption of multiaxial strength envelopes. In this view, the present study proposes a limit analysis-based framework providing high-fidelity predictions for the generalised failure loads of piled foundations. This is accomplished through: (i) the development of an upper-bound solution that better approximates the exact solution compared to existing ones; and (ii) the integration of a recently developed lower-bound solution with a formulation accounting for pile-soil-pile interaction at failure. The comparison between these complementary methods proved to be satisfactory on many load combinations. The proposed framework is readily applicable in design, at a minimal computational effort, as well as in a more refined assessment of structures, as it provides the ultimate limit state surface for a plasticity-based macroelement representation of deep foundations. The framework is used herein to investigate the horizontal efficiency of a well-documented piled foundation, and theoretical predictions are compared with results of fully coupled numerical analyses. The resulting strength envelopes point out the effect of the vertical load on the mutual interaction between piles, which is an indicator of the contribution of the pile’s axial capacity in the activation of multiaxial failure modes.
2023
plasticity; multiaxial failure; horizontal efficiency; design methods and aids; piles and piling
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
RIGOROUS LOWER AND UPPER BOUNDS FOR THE GENERALISED FAILURE LOADS OF PILE GROUPS / Potini, F.; Gorini, D. N.; Conti, C.. - In: GÉOTECHNIQUE LETTERS. - ISSN 2045-2543. - 13:2(2023), pp. 1-7. [10.1680/jgele.22.00138]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Potini_Rigorous_2023.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 932.35 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
932.35 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1682256
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact