Asphyxiation risk due to Oxygen Deficiency Hazard (ODH) can be assessed implementing predictive models of indoor oxygen (O2) level. In the literature, all the models estimating the oxygen concentration by volume (C02) in a working environment are based on a deterministic approach and provide a single-point estimate of C02 as output. However, deterministic model outputs can be uncertain since they can be influenced by a lack of knowledge or incompleteness of information about the exact value of ODH determinants, and/or because mathematical equations could not completely characterize ODH. For these reasons, this paper proposes a study for introducing a stochastic approach in ODH assessment and for performing uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of two existing models. To achieve these objectives, the ODH models were implemented in Microsoft® Excel spreadsheets and @RISK by Palisade was utilized. Some realized cases and simulations are discussed, showing the most interesting results in terms of possible indoor C02 values, their likelihood of occurrence, and the inputs having more effect on the O2 level uncertainty. Attention is also given to the description of implications for safety managers and decision-makers.

Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of models for assessing oxygen deficiency hazard. Preliminary results / Stefana, E.; Marciano, F.; Cocca, P.. - (2020), pp. 2761-2767. (Intervento presentato al convegno 29th European safety and reliability conference, ESREL 2019 tenutosi a Hannover, Germany) [10.3850/978-981-11-2724-3_0036-cd].

Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of models for assessing oxygen deficiency hazard. Preliminary results

Stefana E.;
2020

Abstract

Asphyxiation risk due to Oxygen Deficiency Hazard (ODH) can be assessed implementing predictive models of indoor oxygen (O2) level. In the literature, all the models estimating the oxygen concentration by volume (C02) in a working environment are based on a deterministic approach and provide a single-point estimate of C02 as output. However, deterministic model outputs can be uncertain since they can be influenced by a lack of knowledge or incompleteness of information about the exact value of ODH determinants, and/or because mathematical equations could not completely characterize ODH. For these reasons, this paper proposes a study for introducing a stochastic approach in ODH assessment and for performing uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of two existing models. To achieve these objectives, the ODH models were implemented in Microsoft® Excel spreadsheets and @RISK by Palisade was utilized. Some realized cases and simulations are discussed, showing the most interesting results in terms of possible indoor C02 values, their likelihood of occurrence, and the inputs having more effect on the O2 level uncertainty. Attention is also given to the description of implications for safety managers and decision-makers.
2020
29th European safety and reliability conference, ESREL 2019
asphyxiation risk; inert gas; mathematical model; occupational health and safety; ODH; probability; sensitivity analysis; simulation; uncertainty analysis; workers' exposure
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of models for assessing oxygen deficiency hazard. Preliminary results / Stefana, E.; Marciano, F.; Cocca, P.. - (2020), pp. 2761-2767. (Intervento presentato al convegno 29th European safety and reliability conference, ESREL 2019 tenutosi a Hannover, Germany) [10.3850/978-981-11-2724-3_0036-cd].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Stefana_Uncertainty_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 511.1 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
511.1 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1681602
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact