: Nutrient profiling and front-of-pack labeling (FOPL) have been developed to categorize food products as more or less healthy based on their nutrient content and to easily communicate this information to consumers. The goal is to change individual food choices toward a healthier diet. Since global climate change has recently become an urgent matter, this paper also aims to investigate the correlations between different food health scales, including some FOPLs currently adopted by one or more countries, and several sustainability indicators. For this purpose, a food sustainability composite index has been developed to summarize environmental indicators and compare food scales. Results indicate, as expected, that well-known healthy and sustainable diets are strongly correlated with both environmental indicators and the composite index, while FOPLs based on portions or on 100 g show moderate and weak correlation values, respectively. Within-category analysis has not found any associations that explain these results. Hence, 100 g standard, on which FOPLs are usually developed, seems not to be the ideal basis for developing a label that aspires to communicate healthiness and sustainability in a unique format, as required by the need for simple messaging. On the contrary, FOPLs based on portions appear to be more likely to achieve this goal.

How Much Do Front-Of-Pack Labels Correlate with Food Environmental Impacts? / Muzzioli, Luca; Donini, Lorenzo Maria; Mazziotta, Matteo; Iosa, Marco; Frigerio, Francesco; Poggiogalle, Eleonora; Lenzi, Andrea; Pinto, Alessandro. - In: NUTRIENTS. - ISSN 2072-6643. - 15:5(2023). [10.3390/nu15051176]

How Much Do Front-Of-Pack Labels Correlate with Food Environmental Impacts?

Muzzioli, Luca;Donini, Lorenzo Maria;Mazziotta, Matteo;Iosa, Marco;Frigerio, Francesco;Poggiogalle, Eleonora;Lenzi, Andrea;Pinto, Alessandro
2023

Abstract

: Nutrient profiling and front-of-pack labeling (FOPL) have been developed to categorize food products as more or less healthy based on their nutrient content and to easily communicate this information to consumers. The goal is to change individual food choices toward a healthier diet. Since global climate change has recently become an urgent matter, this paper also aims to investigate the correlations between different food health scales, including some FOPLs currently adopted by one or more countries, and several sustainability indicators. For this purpose, a food sustainability composite index has been developed to summarize environmental indicators and compare food scales. Results indicate, as expected, that well-known healthy and sustainable diets are strongly correlated with both environmental indicators and the composite index, while FOPLs based on portions or on 100 g show moderate and weak correlation values, respectively. Within-category analysis has not found any associations that explain these results. Hence, 100 g standard, on which FOPLs are usually developed, seems not to be the ideal basis for developing a label that aspires to communicate healthiness and sustainability in a unique format, as required by the need for simple messaging. On the contrary, FOPLs based on portions appear to be more likely to achieve this goal.
2023
FOPLs; climate change; composite indicator; environmental sustainability; front-of-pack; global warming; healthy and sustainable diets; nutrient profiling
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
How Much Do Front-Of-Pack Labels Correlate with Food Environmental Impacts? / Muzzioli, Luca; Donini, Lorenzo Maria; Mazziotta, Matteo; Iosa, Marco; Frigerio, Francesco; Poggiogalle, Eleonora; Lenzi, Andrea; Pinto, Alessandro. - In: NUTRIENTS. - ISSN 2072-6643. - 15:5(2023). [10.3390/nu15051176]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1680807
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact