Aim: To systematically review microwave ablation (MWA) protocols, safety, and clinical efficacy for treating bone tumors. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science database. Data concerning patient demographics, tumor characteristics, procedure, complications, and clinical outcomes were extracted and analyzed. Results: Seven non-comparative studies (6 retrospective, 1 prospective) were included accounting for 249 patients and 306 tumors (244/306 [79.7%] metastases; 25/306 [8.2%] myelomas, and 37/306 [12.1%] osteoid osteomas [OO]). In malignant tumors, MWA power was 30-70 W (except in one spinal tumors series where a mean power of 13.3 W was used) with pooled mean ablation time of 308.3 s. With OO, MWA power was 30-60 W with mean ablation time of 90-102 s. Protective measures were very sporadically used in 5 studies. Additional osteoplasty was performed in 199/269 (74.0%) malignant tumors. Clinically significant complications were noted in 10/249 (4.0%) patients. For malignant tumors, estimated pain reduction on the numerical rating scale was 5.3/10 (95% confidence intervals [95%CI] 4.6-6.1) at 1 month; and 5.3/10 (95% CI 4.3-6.3) at the last recorded follow-up (range 20-24 weeks in 4/5 studies). For OO, at 1-month follow-up, effective pain relief was noted in 92.3-100% of patients. Conclusion: MWA is effective in achieving pain relief at short- (1 month) and mid-term (4-6 months) for painful OO and malignant bone tumors, respectively. Although MWA seems safe, further prospective studies are warranted to further assess this aspect, and to standardize MWA protocols. Key points: • Large heterogeneity exists across literature about ablation protocols used with microwave ablation applied for the treatment of benign and malignant bone tumors. • Although microwave ablation of bone tumors appears safe, further studies are needed to assess this aspect, as current literature does not allow definitive conclusions. • Nevertheless, microwave ablation is effective in achieving pain relief at short- (1 month) and mid-term (4-6 months) for painful osteoid osteomas and malignant bone tumors, respectively.

Percutaneous microwave ablation of bone tumors: a systematic review / Luigi Cazzato, Roberto; DE RUBEIS, Gianluca; de Marini, Pierre; Dalili, Danoob; Koch, Guillaume; Auloge, Pierre; Garnon, Julien; Gangi, Afshin. - In: EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 0938-7994. - 31:5(2020), pp. 3530-3541. [10.1007/s00330-020-07382-8]

Percutaneous microwave ablation of bone tumors: a systematic review

Gianluca de Rubeis;
2020

Abstract

Aim: To systematically review microwave ablation (MWA) protocols, safety, and clinical efficacy for treating bone tumors. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science database. Data concerning patient demographics, tumor characteristics, procedure, complications, and clinical outcomes were extracted and analyzed. Results: Seven non-comparative studies (6 retrospective, 1 prospective) were included accounting for 249 patients and 306 tumors (244/306 [79.7%] metastases; 25/306 [8.2%] myelomas, and 37/306 [12.1%] osteoid osteomas [OO]). In malignant tumors, MWA power was 30-70 W (except in one spinal tumors series where a mean power of 13.3 W was used) with pooled mean ablation time of 308.3 s. With OO, MWA power was 30-60 W with mean ablation time of 90-102 s. Protective measures were very sporadically used in 5 studies. Additional osteoplasty was performed in 199/269 (74.0%) malignant tumors. Clinically significant complications were noted in 10/249 (4.0%) patients. For malignant tumors, estimated pain reduction on the numerical rating scale was 5.3/10 (95% confidence intervals [95%CI] 4.6-6.1) at 1 month; and 5.3/10 (95% CI 4.3-6.3) at the last recorded follow-up (range 20-24 weeks in 4/5 studies). For OO, at 1-month follow-up, effective pain relief was noted in 92.3-100% of patients. Conclusion: MWA is effective in achieving pain relief at short- (1 month) and mid-term (4-6 months) for painful OO and malignant bone tumors, respectively. Although MWA seems safe, further prospective studies are warranted to further assess this aspect, and to standardize MWA protocols. Key points: • Large heterogeneity exists across literature about ablation protocols used with microwave ablation applied for the treatment of benign and malignant bone tumors. • Although microwave ablation of bone tumors appears safe, further studies are needed to assess this aspect, as current literature does not allow definitive conclusions. • Nevertheless, microwave ablation is effective in achieving pain relief at short- (1 month) and mid-term (4-6 months) for painful osteoid osteomas and malignant bone tumors, respectively.
2020
Bone; Microwaves; Neoplasms; Pain; Safety
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Percutaneous microwave ablation of bone tumors: a systematic review / Luigi Cazzato, Roberto; DE RUBEIS, Gianluca; de Marini, Pierre; Dalili, Danoob; Koch, Guillaume; Auloge, Pierre; Garnon, Julien; Gangi, Afshin. - In: EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 0938-7994. - 31:5(2020), pp. 3530-3541. [10.1007/s00330-020-07382-8]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1679683
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 42
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 37
social impact