Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining traction in medicine and surgery. AI-based applications can offer tools to examine high-volume data to inform predictive analytics that supports complex decision-making processes. Time-sensitive trauma and emergency contexts are often challenging. The study aims to investigate trauma and emergency surgeons' knowledge and perception of using AI-based tools in clinical decision-making processes. Methods: An online survey grounded on literature regarding AI-enabled surgical decision-making aids was created by a multidisciplinary committee and endorsed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). The survey was advertised to 917 WSES members through the society's website and Twitter profile. Results: 650 surgeons from 71 countries in five continents participated in the survey. Results depict the presence of technology enthusiasts and skeptics and surgeons' preference toward more classical decision-making aids like clinical guidelines, traditional training, and the support of their multidisciplinary colleagues. A lack of knowledge about several AI-related aspects emerges and is associated with mistrust. Discussion: The trauma and emergency surgical community is divided into those who firmly believe in the potential of AI and those who do not understand or trust AI-enabled surgical decision-making aids. Academic societies and surgical training programs should promote a foundational, working knowledge of clinical AI.

Surgeons’ perspectives on artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making in trauma and emergency contexts: results from an international survey / Cobianchi, L., Piccolo, D., Dal Mas, F., Agnoletti, V., Ansaloni, L., Balch, J., Biffl, W., Butturini, G., Catena, F., Coccolini, F., Denicolai, S., De Simone, B., Frigerio, I., Fugazzola, P., Marseglia, G., Marseglia, G.R., Martellucci, J., Modenese, M., Previtali, P., Ruta, F., et al.. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY. - ISSN 1749-7922. - 18:1(2023). [10.1186/s13017-022-00467-3]

Surgeons’ perspectives on artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making in trauma and emergency contexts: results from an international survey

De Simone, Belinda;Frigerio, Isabella;Ruta, Federico;Michele Altomare;Jacopo Andreuccetti;Gioia Brachini;Salvatore Buscemi;Stefano Piero Bernardo Cioffi;Alessandro Coppola;Valerio Cozza;Giancarlo D'Ambrosio;Francesco Favi;Luca Ferrario;Pietro Fransvea;Michela Giulii Capponi;Pierfrancesco Lapolla;Federico Mariani;Pietro Mascagni;Gennaro Mazzarella;Andrea Mingoli;Edoardo Maria Muttillo;Giuseppe Nigri;Mario Pacilli;Ciro Paolillo;Francesco Pata;Silvia Quaresima;Andrea Romanzi;Nicola Tartaglia;Giuseppe Tartaglia;Giuseppe Trigiante Trigiante;Alessandro Vittori;
2023

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining traction in medicine and surgery. AI-based applications can offer tools to examine high-volume data to inform predictive analytics that supports complex decision-making processes. Time-sensitive trauma and emergency contexts are often challenging. The study aims to investigate trauma and emergency surgeons' knowledge and perception of using AI-based tools in clinical decision-making processes. Methods: An online survey grounded on literature regarding AI-enabled surgical decision-making aids was created by a multidisciplinary committee and endorsed by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). The survey was advertised to 917 WSES members through the society's website and Twitter profile. Results: 650 surgeons from 71 countries in five continents participated in the survey. Results depict the presence of technology enthusiasts and skeptics and surgeons' preference toward more classical decision-making aids like clinical guidelines, traditional training, and the support of their multidisciplinary colleagues. A lack of knowledge about several AI-related aspects emerges and is associated with mistrust. Discussion: The trauma and emergency surgical community is divided into those who firmly believe in the potential of AI and those who do not understand or trust AI-enabled surgical decision-making aids. Academic societies and surgical training programs should promote a foundational, working knowledge of clinical AI.
2023
artificial intelligence; clinical decision-making; decision aids; survey; trauma and emergency surgery
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Surgeons’ perspectives on artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making in trauma and emergency contexts: results from an international survey / Cobianchi, L., Piccolo, D., Dal Mas, F., Agnoletti, V., Ansaloni, L., Balch, J., Biffl, W., Butturini, G., Catena, F., Coccolini, F., Denicolai, S., De Simone, B., Frigerio, I., Fugazzola, P., Marseglia, G., Marseglia, G.R., Martellucci, J., Modenese, M., Previtali, P., Ruta, F., et al.. - In: WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY. - ISSN 1749-7922. - 18:1(2023). [10.1186/s13017-022-00467-3]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Cobianchi_Surgeons’-perspectives_2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Surgeons' perspectives on artificial intelligence to support clinical decision-making in trauma and emergency contexts: results from an international survey
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.4 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.4 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1679331
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 32
  • Scopus 59
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 50
social impact