Lightning strikes can cause physical harm to people and damage inside commercial, industrial and residential structures. The risk of damage from lightning depends on the dimensional and environmental characteristics of the structure, the number of people and their permanence in the structure, their reaction to a possible fire as well as the density of lightning strikes to the ground in the structure location. The assessment of the prospected risk determines the need for protective measures if it is higher than the tolerable value. The standard IEC/EN 62305-2 proposes a method to calculate the probable average annual loss in a structure due to lightning flashes. Since the standard is oriented towards analyzing the greatest number of types of structures, the analysis is complex and laborious due to the multitude of parameters to be used. The aim of this paper is to facilitate an easy understanding of the basic parameters to consider and to introduce an analysis aimed at typical cases of buildings in urban environments in order to simplify the IEC/EN method; it is introduced an effective parameter, the risk value in per unit related to the tolerable risk. The application of the suggested simplified formulas to real cases have provided results that coincide absolutely with the values calculated by applying the IEC/EN formulas.

A simplified method for the risk analysis of protection against lightning. Theory and a case study / Parise, Giuseppe; Allegri, Marco; Parise, Luigi. - In: IEEE INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS MAGAZINE. - ISSN 1077-2618. - (2023). [10.1109/MIAS.2023.3264872]

A simplified method for the risk analysis of protection against lightning. Theory and a case study

Giuseppe Parise
Primo
;
2023

Abstract

Lightning strikes can cause physical harm to people and damage inside commercial, industrial and residential structures. The risk of damage from lightning depends on the dimensional and environmental characteristics of the structure, the number of people and their permanence in the structure, their reaction to a possible fire as well as the density of lightning strikes to the ground in the structure location. The assessment of the prospected risk determines the need for protective measures if it is higher than the tolerable value. The standard IEC/EN 62305-2 proposes a method to calculate the probable average annual loss in a structure due to lightning flashes. Since the standard is oriented towards analyzing the greatest number of types of structures, the analysis is complex and laborious due to the multitude of parameters to be used. The aim of this paper is to facilitate an easy understanding of the basic parameters to consider and to introduce an analysis aimed at typical cases of buildings in urban environments in order to simplify the IEC/EN method; it is introduced an effective parameter, the risk value in per unit related to the tolerable risk. The application of the suggested simplified formulas to real cases have provided results that coincide absolutely with the values calculated by applying the IEC/EN formulas.
2023
lightning protection; risk assessment; risk analysis; lightning protection systems; tolerated lightning risk
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
A simplified method for the risk analysis of protection against lightning. Theory and a case study / Parise, Giuseppe; Allegri, Marco; Parise, Luigi. - In: IEEE INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS MAGAZINE. - ISSN 1077-2618. - (2023). [10.1109/MIAS.2023.3264872]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Parise_simplified-method-risk_2023.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 813.9 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
813.9 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1678524
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact