Aims The use of beta-blocker therapy in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is debated. We aimed at describing patterns of beta-blocker prescription through a nationwide survey.Methods and results From 11 referral centres, we retrospectively collected data of CA patients with a first evaluation after 2016 (n = 642). Clinical characteristics at first and last evaluation were collected, with a focus on medical therapy. For patients in whom beta-blocker therapy was started, stopped, or continued between first and last evaluation, the main reason for beta-blocker management was requested. Median age of study population was 77 years; 81% were men. Arterial hypertension was found in 58% of patients, atrial fibrillation (AF) in 57%, and coronary artery disease in 16%. Left ventricular ejection fraction was preserved in 62% of cases, and 74% of patients had advanced diastolic dysfunction. Out of the 250 CA patients on beta-blockers at last evaluation, 215 (33%) were already taking this therapy at first evaluation, while 35 (5%) were started it, in both cases primarily because of high-rate AF. One-hundred-nineteen patients (19%) who were on beta-blocker at first evaluation had this therapy withdrawn, mainly because of intolerance in the presence of heart failure with advanced diastolic dysfunction. The remaining 273 patients (43%) had never received beta-blocker therapy. Beta-blockers usage was similar between CA aetiologies. Patients taking vs. not taking beta-blockers differed only for a greater prevalence of arterial hypertension, coronary artery disease, AF, and non-restrictive filling pattern (P < 0.01 for all) in the former group.Conclusions Beta-blockers prescription is not infrequent in CA. Such therapy may be tolerated in the presence of co-morbidities for which beta-blockers are routinely used and in the absence of advanced diastolic dysfunction.

Current patterns of beta-blocker prescription in cardiac amyloidosis. an Italian nationwide survey / Tini, Giacomo; Cappelli, Francesco; Biagini, Elena; Musumeci, Beatrice; Merlo, Marco; Crotti, Lia; Cameli, Matteo; Di Bella, Gianluca; Cipriani, Alberto; Marzo, Francesca; Guerra, Federico; Forleo, Cinzia; Gagliardi, Christian; Zampieri, Mattia; Carigi, Samuela; Vianello, Pier Filippo; Mandoli, Giulia Elena; Ciliberti, Giuseppe; Lichelli, Luca; Mariani, Davide; Porcari, Aldostefano; Russo, Domitilla; Licordari, Roberto; Ponziani, Alberto; Porto, Italo; Perfetto, Federico; Autore, Camillo; Rapezzi, Claudio; Sinagra, Giafranco; Canepa, Marco. - In: ESC HEART FAILURE. - ISSN 2055-5822. - 8:4(2021), pp. 1-6. [10.1002/ehf2.13411]

Current patterns of beta-blocker prescription in cardiac amyloidosis. an Italian nationwide survey

Tini, Giacomo;Musumeci, Beatrice;Russo, Domitilla;Autore, Camillo;
2021

Abstract

Aims The use of beta-blocker therapy in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is debated. We aimed at describing patterns of beta-blocker prescription through a nationwide survey.Methods and results From 11 referral centres, we retrospectively collected data of CA patients with a first evaluation after 2016 (n = 642). Clinical characteristics at first and last evaluation were collected, with a focus on medical therapy. For patients in whom beta-blocker therapy was started, stopped, or continued between first and last evaluation, the main reason for beta-blocker management was requested. Median age of study population was 77 years; 81% were men. Arterial hypertension was found in 58% of patients, atrial fibrillation (AF) in 57%, and coronary artery disease in 16%. Left ventricular ejection fraction was preserved in 62% of cases, and 74% of patients had advanced diastolic dysfunction. Out of the 250 CA patients on beta-blockers at last evaluation, 215 (33%) were already taking this therapy at first evaluation, while 35 (5%) were started it, in both cases primarily because of high-rate AF. One-hundred-nineteen patients (19%) who were on beta-blocker at first evaluation had this therapy withdrawn, mainly because of intolerance in the presence of heart failure with advanced diastolic dysfunction. The remaining 273 patients (43%) had never received beta-blocker therapy. Beta-blockers usage was similar between CA aetiologies. Patients taking vs. not taking beta-blockers differed only for a greater prevalence of arterial hypertension, coronary artery disease, AF, and non-restrictive filling pattern (P < 0.01 for all) in the former group.Conclusions Beta-blockers prescription is not infrequent in CA. Such therapy may be tolerated in the presence of co-morbidities for which beta-blockers are routinely used and in the absence of advanced diastolic dysfunction.
2021
beta-blockers; cardiac amyloidosis; heart failure; light chains; transthyretin
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Current patterns of beta-blocker prescription in cardiac amyloidosis. an Italian nationwide survey / Tini, Giacomo; Cappelli, Francesco; Biagini, Elena; Musumeci, Beatrice; Merlo, Marco; Crotti, Lia; Cameli, Matteo; Di Bella, Gianluca; Cipriani, Alberto; Marzo, Francesca; Guerra, Federico; Forleo, Cinzia; Gagliardi, Christian; Zampieri, Mattia; Carigi, Samuela; Vianello, Pier Filippo; Mandoli, Giulia Elena; Ciliberti, Giuseppe; Lichelli, Luca; Mariani, Davide; Porcari, Aldostefano; Russo, Domitilla; Licordari, Roberto; Ponziani, Alberto; Porto, Italo; Perfetto, Federico; Autore, Camillo; Rapezzi, Claudio; Sinagra, Giafranco; Canepa, Marco. - In: ESC HEART FAILURE. - ISSN 2055-5822. - 8:4(2021), pp. 1-6. [10.1002/ehf2.13411]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Tini_Current-patterns-of beta-blocker_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 330.02 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
330.02 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1678307
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact