The anti-oxidative activity of plant-derived extracts is well-known and confers health-promoting effects on functional foods and food supplements. Aim of this work is to evaluate the capability of two different assays to predict the real biological antioxidant efficiency. At this purpose, extracts from five different plant-derived matrices and commercial purified phytochemicals were analyzed for their anti-oxidative properties by using well-standardized in vitro chemical method (TEAC) and an ex vivo biological assay. The biological assay, a cellular membrane system obtained from erythrocytes of healthy volunteers, is based on the capability of phytochemicals treatment to prevent membrane lipid peroxidation under oxidative stress by UV-B radiation. Plant extracts naturally rich in phenols with different structure and purified phytochemicals showed different in vitro and ex vivo antioxidant capacities. A high correlation between phenolic contents of the plant-derived extracts and their ability to prevent oxidative injuries in a biological system was found, thus underlying the relevance of this class of metabolites in preventing oxidative stress. On the other hand, a low correlation between the antioxidant capacities was shown between in vitro and ex vivo antioxidant assay. Moreover, data presented in this work show how food complex matrices are more effective in preventing oxidative damages at biological level than pure phytochemicals, even if for these latter, the antioxidant activity was generally higher than that observed for food complex matrices.

Comparison between in vitro chemical and ex vivo biological assays to evaluate antioxidant capacity of botanical extracts / Pasqualetti, V.; Locato, V.; Fanali, C.; Mulinacci, N.; Cimini, S.; Morgia, A. M.; Pasqua, G.; De Gara, L.. - In: ANTIOXIDANTS. - ISSN 2076-3921. - 10:7(2021), p. 1136. [10.3390/antiox10071136]

Comparison between in vitro chemical and ex vivo biological assays to evaluate antioxidant capacity of botanical extracts

Pasqua G.;
2021

Abstract

The anti-oxidative activity of plant-derived extracts is well-known and confers health-promoting effects on functional foods and food supplements. Aim of this work is to evaluate the capability of two different assays to predict the real biological antioxidant efficiency. At this purpose, extracts from five different plant-derived matrices and commercial purified phytochemicals were analyzed for their anti-oxidative properties by using well-standardized in vitro chemical method (TEAC) and an ex vivo biological assay. The biological assay, a cellular membrane system obtained from erythrocytes of healthy volunteers, is based on the capability of phytochemicals treatment to prevent membrane lipid peroxidation under oxidative stress by UV-B radiation. Plant extracts naturally rich in phenols with different structure and purified phytochemicals showed different in vitro and ex vivo antioxidant capacities. A high correlation between phenolic contents of the plant-derived extracts and their ability to prevent oxidative injuries in a biological system was found, thus underlying the relevance of this class of metabolites in preventing oxidative stress. On the other hand, a low correlation between the antioxidant capacities was shown between in vitro and ex vivo antioxidant assay. Moreover, data presented in this work show how food complex matrices are more effective in preventing oxidative damages at biological level than pure phytochemicals, even if for these latter, the antioxidant activity was generally higher than that observed for food complex matrices.
2021
human red blood cell membranes; lipid peroxidation; oxidative stress; phenolic acids; polyphenols
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Comparison between in vitro chemical and ex vivo biological assays to evaluate antioxidant capacity of botanical extracts / Pasqualetti, V.; Locato, V.; Fanali, C.; Mulinacci, N.; Cimini, S.; Morgia, A. M.; Pasqua, G.; De Gara, L.. - In: ANTIOXIDANTS. - ISSN 2076-3921. - 10:7(2021), p. 1136. [10.3390/antiox10071136]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Pasqualetti_Comparison_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Articolo rivista
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.39 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.39 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1677961
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact