Radiation therapy (RT) is an effective treatment for patients with either nonfunctioning or secreting pituitary adenomas unsuccessfully treated by surgery and/or medical therapy, resulting in local control of 90–95% at 5–10 years and variable normalization of hormonal hypersecretion for patients with GH-, ACTH-, and prolactin-secreting adenomas in the range of 40–80% at 5 years; however, its use has been limited because of concerns regarding potential late toxicity of radiation and delayed efficacy in normalization of hormone hypersecretion. In the last decades, there have been advances in all aspects of radiation treatment, including more accurate immobilization, imaging, treatment planning and dose delivery. RT has evolved with the development of highly conformal stereotactic techniques and new planning and dose delivery techniques, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). All these new techniques allow precise and sharply focused radiation delivery reducing the dose to surrounding critical neurovascular and brain structures, and potentially limiting the long-term consequences of radiation treatments. In this review, we present a critical analysis of the more recent available literature on the use of RT in patients with both nonfunctioning and secreting pituitary adenomas, focussing particularly on the risk/benefit ratio of modern radiation techniques.

The risk/benefit ratio of radiotherapy in pituitary tumors / Minniti, G.; Flickinger, J.. - In: BAILLIERE'S BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH. CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM. - ISSN 1521-690X. - 33:2(2019). [10.1016/j.beem.2019.04.003]

The risk/benefit ratio of radiotherapy in pituitary tumors

Minniti G.
Primo
;
2019

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) is an effective treatment for patients with either nonfunctioning or secreting pituitary adenomas unsuccessfully treated by surgery and/or medical therapy, resulting in local control of 90–95% at 5–10 years and variable normalization of hormonal hypersecretion for patients with GH-, ACTH-, and prolactin-secreting adenomas in the range of 40–80% at 5 years; however, its use has been limited because of concerns regarding potential late toxicity of radiation and delayed efficacy in normalization of hormone hypersecretion. In the last decades, there have been advances in all aspects of radiation treatment, including more accurate immobilization, imaging, treatment planning and dose delivery. RT has evolved with the development of highly conformal stereotactic techniques and new planning and dose delivery techniques, including intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). All these new techniques allow precise and sharply focused radiation delivery reducing the dose to surrounding critical neurovascular and brain structures, and potentially limiting the long-term consequences of radiation treatments. In this review, we present a critical analysis of the more recent available literature on the use of RT in patients with both nonfunctioning and secreting pituitary adenomas, focussing particularly on the risk/benefit ratio of modern radiation techniques.
2019
fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy; nonfunctioning and secreting pituitary adenomas; radiosurgery; toxicity
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
The risk/benefit ratio of radiotherapy in pituitary tumors / Minniti, G.; Flickinger, J.. - In: BAILLIERE'S BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH. CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM. - ISSN 1521-690X. - 33:2(2019). [10.1016/j.beem.2019.04.003]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Minniti_The risk_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 375.71 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
375.71 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1676327
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact