We contribute to a recent literature on the normalization, calibration and estimation of CES production functions. The problem arises because CES 'share' parameters are not in fact shares, but depend on underlying dimensions-in other words they are 'dimensional constants'. It follows that such parameters can neither be calibrated nor be estimated unless the choice of units is made explicit. We use an RBC model to demonstrate two equivalent solutions. The standard one expresses the production function in deviation form about some reference point, usually the steady state of the model. Our alternative, 're-parameterization', expresses dimensional constants in terms of a new dimensionless (share) parameter and all remaining dimensionless ones. We show that our 're-parameterization' method is equivalent and arguably more straightforward than the standard normalization in deviation form. We then examine a similar problem of dimensional constants for CES utility functions in a two-sector model and in a small open economy model; then re-parameterization is the only solution to the problem, showing that our approach is in fact more general. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.

Getting normalization right. Dealing with 'dimensional constants' in macroeconomics / Cantore, C.; Levine, P.. - In: JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL. - ISSN 0165-1889. - 36:12(2012), pp. 1931-1949. [10.1016/j.jedc.2012.05.009]

Getting normalization right. Dealing with 'dimensional constants' in macroeconomics

Cantore C.;
2012

Abstract

We contribute to a recent literature on the normalization, calibration and estimation of CES production functions. The problem arises because CES 'share' parameters are not in fact shares, but depend on underlying dimensions-in other words they are 'dimensional constants'. It follows that such parameters can neither be calibrated nor be estimated unless the choice of units is made explicit. We use an RBC model to demonstrate two equivalent solutions. The standard one expresses the production function in deviation form about some reference point, usually the steady state of the model. Our alternative, 're-parameterization', expresses dimensional constants in terms of a new dimensionless (share) parameter and all remaining dimensionless ones. We show that our 're-parameterization' method is equivalent and arguably more straightforward than the standard normalization in deviation form. We then examine a similar problem of dimensional constants for CES utility functions in a two-sector model and in a small open economy model; then re-parameterization is the only solution to the problem, showing that our approach is in fact more general. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.
2012
CES production function; CES utility function; normalization
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Getting normalization right. Dealing with 'dimensional constants' in macroeconomics / Cantore, C.; Levine, P.. - In: JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL. - ISSN 0165-1889. - 36:12(2012), pp. 1931-1949. [10.1016/j.jedc.2012.05.009]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Cantore_Getting_2012.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 357.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
357.16 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1676286
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 30
social impact