The aim of this paper is to evaluate whether the acceptability of different types of business- and individual-level non-compliance has different impacts on the likelihood of participation in undeclared work. To evaluate this, data is reported on the EU27 and the UK from the special Eurobarometer survey no. 498, using a novel statistical methodology that deals with two potential sources of bias: sample selection error (avoidance to answer to the question about participation to undeclared work) and misclassification in the response variable (false statements about engagement in undeclared work). This reveals the association between tax morale and participation in undeclared work. It shows that citizens find far more unacceptable undeclared work conducted by firms than individuals, but both are significantly associated with participation in undeclared work although the greatest effect is clearly exerted by individual-level tax morale. This paper uses a methodology that accounts for the potential bias related to sample selection error and misclassification in the response variable of participation in undeclared work and sheds light on different components of tax morale.
Revisiting tax morale: evaluating the acceptability of business- and individual-level non-compliance on participation in undeclared work / Arezzo, Maria Felice; Williams, Colin C.; Horodnic, IOANA ALEXANDRA; Guagnano, Giuseppina. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER. - ISSN 0143-7720. - (2023). [10.1108/IJM-11-2022-0543]
Revisiting tax morale: evaluating the acceptability of business- and individual-level non-compliance on participation in undeclared work
Maria Felice Arezzo
;Ioana Alexandra Horodnic;Giuseppina Guagnano
2023
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to evaluate whether the acceptability of different types of business- and individual-level non-compliance has different impacts on the likelihood of participation in undeclared work. To evaluate this, data is reported on the EU27 and the UK from the special Eurobarometer survey no. 498, using a novel statistical methodology that deals with two potential sources of bias: sample selection error (avoidance to answer to the question about participation to undeclared work) and misclassification in the response variable (false statements about engagement in undeclared work). This reveals the association between tax morale and participation in undeclared work. It shows that citizens find far more unacceptable undeclared work conducted by firms than individuals, but both are significantly associated with participation in undeclared work although the greatest effect is clearly exerted by individual-level tax morale. This paper uses a methodology that accounts for the potential bias related to sample selection error and misclassification in the response variable of participation in undeclared work and sheds light on different components of tax morale.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ViewPageProof_IJM_11-2022-0543.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore, precedente alla peer review)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
467.37 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
467.37 kB | Adobe PDF | |
ArezzoGuagnano_Revisiting-tax-morale_2023.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
5.3 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
5.3 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.