Root canal treatment (RCT) eliminates damaged pulpal tissue and protects the tooth from recurrent microbial invasion. Post-endodontic pain (PEP) is a frequently encountered complication of root canal therapy. It can have an impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL) and their subjective perception of treatment options. Thus, a self-assessment questionnaire was used to evaluate and compare the influence of manual, rotary, and reciprocating file shaping procedures on immediate post-operative quality of life (POQoL) involving single-visit root canal therapy. It was a double-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. A total of 120 participants were randomly assigned sequentially to three groups comprising 40 patients in each group: Group A: Hand K file (positive control); Group B: ProTaper Next file system; and Group C: WaveOne Gold. Post-operative pain was evaluated using a 4-point visual analog scale (VAS) after 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 1 week. The highest post-operative pain was with manual instrumentation using hand K files, and the lowest was with reciprocating and rotating instrumentations. No significant difference was noted between the parameters of quality of life assessed, suggesting the filing system or technique had a similar effect.

Post-operative quality of life after single-visit root canal treatment employing three different instrumentation techniques—An institutional randomized clinical trial / Shetty, V.; Yelke, S.; Wahjuningrum, D. A.; Luke, A. M.; Testarelli, L.; Giardino, L.; Pawar, A. M.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 12:4(2023). [10.3390/jcm12041535]

Post-operative quality of life after single-visit root canal treatment employing three different instrumentation techniques—An institutional randomized clinical trial

Testarelli L.
Conceptualization
;
2023

Abstract

Root canal treatment (RCT) eliminates damaged pulpal tissue and protects the tooth from recurrent microbial invasion. Post-endodontic pain (PEP) is a frequently encountered complication of root canal therapy. It can have an impact on patients’ quality of life (QoL) and their subjective perception of treatment options. Thus, a self-assessment questionnaire was used to evaluate and compare the influence of manual, rotary, and reciprocating file shaping procedures on immediate post-operative quality of life (POQoL) involving single-visit root canal therapy. It was a double-blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial. A total of 120 participants were randomly assigned sequentially to three groups comprising 40 patients in each group: Group A: Hand K file (positive control); Group B: ProTaper Next file system; and Group C: WaveOne Gold. Post-operative pain was evaluated using a 4-point visual analog scale (VAS) after 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 1 week. The highest post-operative pain was with manual instrumentation using hand K files, and the lowest was with reciprocating and rotating instrumentations. No significant difference was noted between the parameters of quality of life assessed, suggesting the filing system or technique had a similar effect.
2023
endodontics; file systems; post-endodontic pain (PEP); quality of life (QoL); reciprocating files; root canal treatment; rotating files
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Post-operative quality of life after single-visit root canal treatment employing three different instrumentation techniques—An institutional randomized clinical trial / Shetty, V.; Yelke, S.; Wahjuningrum, D. A.; Luke, A. M.; Testarelli, L.; Giardino, L.; Pawar, A. M.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 12:4(2023). [10.3390/jcm12041535]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Shetty_Post-operative_2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 601.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
601.3 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1673677
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact