This paper investigates the reduction of Cross-Country-Faults currents in medium voltage (MV) cable networks in order to decrease thermal stress of cable screens, especially inside joints. Four methods are analyzed: 1) disconnection of cable screens from the earth electrode of primary substation (PS); 2) buried ground wire laid near the cable lines and connected to each earth electrode of secondary substations (SSs) and PS; 3) buried ground wire and disconnection of the bonded cable screens from the earth electrode only at sending/receiving end of each cable line between two consecutive SSs; 4) cross bonding of cable screens between two consecutive SSs. Methods are analysed by ATP-EMTP simulations of a 150/20 kV radial test system formed by eight 5 km long cable lines equipped with 50 mm2 copper conductors per phase and 16 mm2 copper screen per cable. Compared to the limiting reactors countermeasure presented in a previous paper by the authors, which seems the solution less burdensome both technically and economically for existing lines, method 3 is more effective but its implementation is limited only to newly built lines, whereas the main drawback of method 1 is the increase of ground potential rise at fault locations.

Countermeasures for reduction of screen currents due to cross country faults in MV cable distribution networks / Cerretti, A.; D'Orazio, L.; Gatta, F. M.; Geri, A.; Lauria, S.; Maccioni, M.. - In: ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH. - ISSN 0378-7796. - 214:(2023), pp. 1-11. [10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108894]

Countermeasures for reduction of screen currents due to cross country faults in MV cable distribution networks

F. M. Gatta;A. Geri;S. Lauria;M. Maccioni
2023

Abstract

This paper investigates the reduction of Cross-Country-Faults currents in medium voltage (MV) cable networks in order to decrease thermal stress of cable screens, especially inside joints. Four methods are analyzed: 1) disconnection of cable screens from the earth electrode of primary substation (PS); 2) buried ground wire laid near the cable lines and connected to each earth electrode of secondary substations (SSs) and PS; 3) buried ground wire and disconnection of the bonded cable screens from the earth electrode only at sending/receiving end of each cable line between two consecutive SSs; 4) cross bonding of cable screens between two consecutive SSs. Methods are analysed by ATP-EMTP simulations of a 150/20 kV radial test system formed by eight 5 km long cable lines equipped with 50 mm2 copper conductors per phase and 16 mm2 copper screen per cable. Compared to the limiting reactors countermeasure presented in a previous paper by the authors, which seems the solution less burdensome both technically and economically for existing lines, method 3 is more effective but its implementation is limited only to newly built lines, whereas the main drawback of method 1 is the increase of ground potential rise at fault locations.
2023
cross-country-fault; cable screen; MV cable distribution network; ground wire; bonded cable screens; equivalent earth impedance
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Countermeasures for reduction of screen currents due to cross country faults in MV cable distribution networks / Cerretti, A.; D'Orazio, L.; Gatta, F. M.; Geri, A.; Lauria, S.; Maccioni, M.. - In: ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH. - ISSN 0378-7796. - 214:(2023), pp. 1-11. [10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108894]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Cerretti_Countermeasures_2023.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 3.43 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.43 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1668463
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact