Climate change and political polarization are two of the twenty-first century’s critical socio-political issues. Here we investigate their intersection by studying the discussion around the United Nations Conference of the Parties on Climate Change (COP) using Twitter data from 2014 to 2021. First, we reveal a large increase in ideological polarization during COP26, following low polarization between COP20 and COP25. Second, we show that this increase is driven by growing right-wing activity, a fourfold increase since COP21 relative to pro-climate groups. Finally, we identify a broad range of ‘climate contrarian’ views during COP26, emphasizing the theme of political hypocrisy as a topic of cross-ideological appeal; contrarian views and accusations of hypocrisy have become key themes in the Twitter climate discussion since 2019. With future climate action reliant on negotiations at COP27 and beyond, our results highlight the importance of monitoring polarization and its impacts in the public climate discourse.

Growing polarization around climate change on social media / Falkenberg, Max; Galeazzi, Alessandro; Torricelli, Maddalena; Di Marco, Niccol??; Larosa, Francesca; Sas, Madalina; Mekacher, Amin; Pearce, Warren; Zollo, Fabiana; Quattrociocchi, Walter; Baronchelli, Andrea. - In: NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE. - ISSN 1758-678X. - 12:12(2022), pp. 1114-1121. [10.1038/s41558-022-01527-x]

Growing polarization around climate change on social media

Walter Quattrociocchi;Andrea Baronchelli
2022

Abstract

Climate change and political polarization are two of the twenty-first century’s critical socio-political issues. Here we investigate their intersection by studying the discussion around the United Nations Conference of the Parties on Climate Change (COP) using Twitter data from 2014 to 2021. First, we reveal a large increase in ideological polarization during COP26, following low polarization between COP20 and COP25. Second, we show that this increase is driven by growing right-wing activity, a fourfold increase since COP21 relative to pro-climate groups. Finally, we identify a broad range of ‘climate contrarian’ views during COP26, emphasizing the theme of political hypocrisy as a topic of cross-ideological appeal; contrarian views and accusations of hypocrisy have become key themes in the Twitter climate discussion since 2019. With future climate action reliant on negotiations at COP27 and beyond, our results highlight the importance of monitoring polarization and its impacts in the public climate discourse.
2022
Polarization, Echo chambers, Climate Change
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Growing polarization around climate change on social media / Falkenberg, Max; Galeazzi, Alessandro; Torricelli, Maddalena; Di Marco, Niccol??; Larosa, Francesca; Sas, Madalina; Mekacher, Amin; Pearce, Warren; Zollo, Fabiana; Quattrociocchi, Walter; Baronchelli, Andrea. - In: NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE. - ISSN 1758-678X. - 12:12(2022), pp. 1114-1121. [10.1038/s41558-022-01527-x]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1667962
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 41
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact