Background Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) may arise from deleterious monogenic variants in FH-causing genes as well as from a polygenic cause. We evaluated the relationships between monogenic FH and polygenic hypercholesterolemia in influencing the long-term response to therapy and the risk of atherosclerosis. Methods and Results A cohort of 370 patients with clinically diagnosed FH were screened for monogenic mutations and a low-density lipoprotein-rising genetic risk score >0.69 to identify polygenic cause. Medical records were reviewed to estimate the response to lipid-lowering therapies and the occurrence of major atherosclerotic cardiovascular events during a median follow-up of 31.0 months. A subgroup of patients (n=119) also underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery calcium score and severity of coronary stenosis as compared with 135 controls. Two hundred nine (56.5%) patients with hypercholesterolemia were classified as monogenic (FH/M+), 89 (24.1%) as polygenic, and 72 (19.5%) genetically undefined (FH/M-). The response to lipid-lowering therapy was poorest in monogenic, whereas it was comparable in patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia and genetically undetermined. Mean coronary artery calcium score and the prevalence of coronary artery calcium >100 units were significantly higher in FH/M+ as compared with both FH/M- and controls. Finally, after adjustments for confounders, we observed a 5-fold higher risk of incident major atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in FH/M+ (hazard ratio, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.06-21.36; Padj=0.041). Conclusions Monogenic cause of FH is associated with lower response to conventional cholesterol-lowering therapies as well as with increased burden of coronary atherosclerosis and risk of atherosclerotic-related events. Genetic testing for hypercholesterolemia is helpful in providing important prognostic information.

Clinical implications of monogenic versus polygenic hypercholesterolemia: long-term response to treatment, coronary atherosclerosis burden, and cardiovascular events / D'Erasmo, L; Minicocci, I; Di Costanzo, A; Pigna, G; Commodari, D; Ceci, F; Montali, A; Brancato, F; Stanca, I; Nicolucci, A; Ascione, A; Galea, N; Carbone, I; Francone, M; Maranghi, M; Arca, M.. - In: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION. CARDIOVASCULAR AND CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE. - ISSN 2047-9980. - 10:9(2021). [10.1161/JAHA.120.018932]

Clinical implications of monogenic versus polygenic hypercholesterolemia: long-term response to treatment, coronary atherosclerosis burden, and cardiovascular events

D'Erasmo L
Primo
;
Minicocci I
Secondo
;
Di Costanzo A;Pigna G;Commodari D;Ceci F;Montali A;Brancato F;Nicolucci A;Ascione A;Galea N;Carbone I;Francone M;Maranghi M
Penultimo
;
Arca M.
Ultimo
2021

Abstract

Background Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) may arise from deleterious monogenic variants in FH-causing genes as well as from a polygenic cause. We evaluated the relationships between monogenic FH and polygenic hypercholesterolemia in influencing the long-term response to therapy and the risk of atherosclerosis. Methods and Results A cohort of 370 patients with clinically diagnosed FH were screened for monogenic mutations and a low-density lipoprotein-rising genetic risk score >0.69 to identify polygenic cause. Medical records were reviewed to estimate the response to lipid-lowering therapies and the occurrence of major atherosclerotic cardiovascular events during a median follow-up of 31.0 months. A subgroup of patients (n=119) also underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery calcium score and severity of coronary stenosis as compared with 135 controls. Two hundred nine (56.5%) patients with hypercholesterolemia were classified as monogenic (FH/M+), 89 (24.1%) as polygenic, and 72 (19.5%) genetically undefined (FH/M-). The response to lipid-lowering therapy was poorest in monogenic, whereas it was comparable in patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia and genetically undetermined. Mean coronary artery calcium score and the prevalence of coronary artery calcium >100 units were significantly higher in FH/M+ as compared with both FH/M- and controls. Finally, after adjustments for confounders, we observed a 5-fold higher risk of incident major atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in FH/M+ (hazard ratio, 4.8; 95% CI, 1.06-21.36; Padj=0.041). Conclusions Monogenic cause of FH is associated with lower response to conventional cholesterol-lowering therapies as well as with increased burden of coronary atherosclerosis and risk of atherosclerotic-related events. Genetic testing for hypercholesterolemia is helpful in providing important prognostic information.
2021
atherosclerosis; cardiovascular disease; genetics; hypercholesterolemia; therapy
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Clinical implications of monogenic versus polygenic hypercholesterolemia: long-term response to treatment, coronary atherosclerosis burden, and cardiovascular events / D'Erasmo, L; Minicocci, I; Di Costanzo, A; Pigna, G; Commodari, D; Ceci, F; Montali, A; Brancato, F; Stanca, I; Nicolucci, A; Ascione, A; Galea, N; Carbone, I; Francone, M; Maranghi, M; Arca, M.. - In: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION. CARDIOVASCULAR AND CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE. - ISSN 2047-9980. - 10:9(2021). [10.1161/JAHA.120.018932]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
D'Erasmo_Clinical iplications_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 731.61 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
731.61 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1667829
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 20
  • Scopus 28
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact