The periodic rail track inspection is mandatory to ensure ride comfort and operational safety. However, conventional monitoring technologies have high costs, stimulating research on low-cost alternatives. In this regard, this paper presents the first experimental results on the use of multiple very low-cost sensors aboard trains for vibration monitoring, proposing a collective approach to provide more accurate and robust results. Nine devices comprising commercial-grade inertial sensors were tested in different distributions aboard a high-speed track recording train. Frequency weighted accelerations were calculated in accordance with ISO 2631 standard as comfort and indirect track quality index. As expected, vertical and lateral results were correlated with, respectively, track longitudinal level (range D1, maximum correlation coefficient of 0.86) and alignment (range D2, maximum correlation coefficient of 0.60), with numerically similar results when considering the fused signal. The collective approach's potential was proven as a result of the noise reduction and the discrepant sensor identification.

Experimental investigation on the use of multiple very low-cost inertial-based devices for comfort assessment and rail track monitoring / de Oliveira, R. H.; Loprencipe, G.; Vaz de Almeida Filho, F. G.; de Sousa Pissardini, R.. - In: MEASUREMENT. - ISSN 0263-2241. - 199:(2022). [10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111549]

Experimental investigation on the use of multiple very low-cost inertial-based devices for comfort assessment and rail track monitoring

Loprencipe G.;
2022

Abstract

The periodic rail track inspection is mandatory to ensure ride comfort and operational safety. However, conventional monitoring technologies have high costs, stimulating research on low-cost alternatives. In this regard, this paper presents the first experimental results on the use of multiple very low-cost sensors aboard trains for vibration monitoring, proposing a collective approach to provide more accurate and robust results. Nine devices comprising commercial-grade inertial sensors were tested in different distributions aboard a high-speed track recording train. Frequency weighted accelerations were calculated in accordance with ISO 2631 standard as comfort and indirect track quality index. As expected, vertical and lateral results were correlated with, respectively, track longitudinal level (range D1, maximum correlation coefficient of 0.86) and alignment (range D2, maximum correlation coefficient of 0.60), with numerically similar results when considering the fused signal. The collective approach's potential was proven as a result of the noise reduction and the discrepant sensor identification.
2022
collective monitoring; high-speed rail; inertial measurement unit; multi-sensor data fusion; rail track monitoring; ride comfort analysis
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Experimental investigation on the use of multiple very low-cost inertial-based devices for comfort assessment and rail track monitoring / de Oliveira, R. H.; Loprencipe, G.; Vaz de Almeida Filho, F. G.; de Sousa Pissardini, R.. - In: MEASUREMENT. - ISSN 0263-2241. - 199:(2022). [10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111549]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
de Oliveira_Experimental-investigation-on_2022.pdf.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: pre_print
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore, precedente alla peer review)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 3.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.51 MB Adobe PDF
de Oliveira_Experimental-investigation-on_2022.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Note: articolo
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 11.27 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
11.27 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1666679
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact