We aim to validate echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) mass (echoLVM) in sixty-one patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), using cardiac magnetic resonance measures (cmrLVM) as gold standard. cmrLVM was calculated using LV short-axis images, from base to apex, whereas echoLVM by LV epicardial minus LV endocardial volumes in 4 and 2 chamber views, using Simpson disk summation; trabeculae and papillary muscle were excluded in both cmrLVM and echoLVM. cmrLVM and echoLVM were not different by paired t test (145 ± 66 vs 147 ± 61; p = 0.240), and their correlation was good (r = 0.977; p < 0.0001). Intraclass correlation demonstrated reliability of echoLVM with cmrLVM (ρ = 0.987; Cls = 0.978-0.992; p < 0.0001). LV end-diastolic volume was higher by CMR than that by echo (137 ± 33 vs 85 ± 28 mL, p < 0.0001), resulting in a lower mass/volume ratio (1.1 ± 0.4 vs 1.8 ± 0.8, p < 0.0001). EchoLVM may be determined in patients with HCM. However, mass/volume ratio is higher by echocardiography than that by CMR.

Left Ventricular Mass in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Assessed by 2D-Echocardiography. Validation with Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Losi, Maria Angela; Imbriaco, Massimo; Canciello, Grazia; Pacelli, Filomena; DI NARDO, Carlo; Lombardi, Raffaella; Izzo, Raffaele; Mancusi, Costantino; Ponsiglione, Andrea; Dell'Aversana, Serena; Cuocolo, Alberto; de Simone, Giovanni; Trimarco, Bruno; Barbato, Emanuele. - In: JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 1937-5387. - 13:2(2020), pp. 238-244. [10.1007/s12265-019-09911-3]

Left Ventricular Mass in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Assessed by 2D-Echocardiography. Validation with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Barbato, Emanuele
2020

Abstract

We aim to validate echocardiographic left ventricular (LV) mass (echoLVM) in sixty-one patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), using cardiac magnetic resonance measures (cmrLVM) as gold standard. cmrLVM was calculated using LV short-axis images, from base to apex, whereas echoLVM by LV epicardial minus LV endocardial volumes in 4 and 2 chamber views, using Simpson disk summation; trabeculae and papillary muscle were excluded in both cmrLVM and echoLVM. cmrLVM and echoLVM were not different by paired t test (145 ± 66 vs 147 ± 61; p = 0.240), and their correlation was good (r = 0.977; p < 0.0001). Intraclass correlation demonstrated reliability of echoLVM with cmrLVM (ρ = 0.987; Cls = 0.978-0.992; p < 0.0001). LV end-diastolic volume was higher by CMR than that by echo (137 ± 33 vs 85 ± 28 mL, p < 0.0001), resulting in a lower mass/volume ratio (1.1 ± 0.4 vs 1.8 ± 0.8, p < 0.0001). EchoLVM may be determined in patients with HCM. However, mass/volume ratio is higher by echocardiography than that by CMR.
2020
cardiac magnetic resonance; echocardiography; hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; left ventricular mass
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Left Ventricular Mass in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Assessed by 2D-Echocardiography. Validation with Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Losi, Maria Angela; Imbriaco, Massimo; Canciello, Grazia; Pacelli, Filomena; DI NARDO, Carlo; Lombardi, Raffaella; Izzo, Raffaele; Mancusi, Costantino; Ponsiglione, Andrea; Dell'Aversana, Serena; Cuocolo, Alberto; de Simone, Giovanni; Trimarco, Bruno; Barbato, Emanuele. - In: JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 1937-5387. - 13:2(2020), pp. 238-244. [10.1007/s12265-019-09911-3]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Losi_Left-Ventricular-Mass-in-Hypertrophic_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 815.93 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
815.93 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1660470
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact