Fractional flow reserve is the current invasive gold standard for assessing the ischemic potential of an angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis. Procedural cost and time, the need for coronary vessel instrumentation, and the need to administer adenosine to achieve maximal hyperemia remain integral components of invasive fractional flow reserve. The number of new alternatives to fractional flow reserve has proliferated over the last ten years using techniques ranging from alternative pressure wire metrics to anatomic simulation via angiography or intravascular imaging. This review article provides a critical description of the currently available or under-development alternatives to fractional flow reserve with a special focus on the available evidence, pros, and cons for each with a view towards their clinical application in the near future for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease.

Novel Indices of Coronary Physiology. Do We Need Alternatives to Fractional Flow Reserve? / De Maria, G. L.; Garcia-Garcia, H. M.; Scarsini, R.; Hideo-Kajita, A.; Gonzalo Lopez, N.; Leone, A. M.; Sarno, G.; Daemen, J.; Shlofmitz, E.; Jeremias, A.; Tebaldi, M.; Bezerra, H. G.; Tu, S.; Lemos, P. A.; Ozaki, Y.; Dan, K.; Collet, C.; Banning, A. P.; Barbato, E.; Johnson, N. P.; Waksman, R.. - In: CIRCULATION. CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS.. - ISSN 1941-7640. - 13:4(2020), pp. 1-13. [10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008487]

Novel Indices of Coronary Physiology. Do We Need Alternatives to Fractional Flow Reserve?

Barbato E.;
2020

Abstract

Fractional flow reserve is the current invasive gold standard for assessing the ischemic potential of an angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis. Procedural cost and time, the need for coronary vessel instrumentation, and the need to administer adenosine to achieve maximal hyperemia remain integral components of invasive fractional flow reserve. The number of new alternatives to fractional flow reserve has proliferated over the last ten years using techniques ranging from alternative pressure wire metrics to anatomic simulation via angiography or intravascular imaging. This review article provides a critical description of the currently available or under-development alternatives to fractional flow reserve with a special focus on the available evidence, pros, and cons for each with a view towards their clinical application in the near future for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease.
2020
angiography; computed tomography; coronary artery disease; fractional flow reserve; hyperemia; intravascular imaging; cardiac catheters; coronary artery disease; coronary vessels; humans; predictive value of tests; prognosis; reproducibility of results; transducers; pressure; cardiac catheterization; cardiac imaging techniques; fractional flow reserve; myocardial
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
Novel Indices of Coronary Physiology. Do We Need Alternatives to Fractional Flow Reserve? / De Maria, G. L.; Garcia-Garcia, H. M.; Scarsini, R.; Hideo-Kajita, A.; Gonzalo Lopez, N.; Leone, A. M.; Sarno, G.; Daemen, J.; Shlofmitz, E.; Jeremias, A.; Tebaldi, M.; Bezerra, H. G.; Tu, S.; Lemos, P. A.; Ozaki, Y.; Dan, K.; Collet, C.; Banning, A. P.; Barbato, E.; Johnson, N. P.; Waksman, R.. - In: CIRCULATION. CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS.. - ISSN 1941-7640. - 13:4(2020), pp. 1-13. [10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008487]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
DeMaria_Novel-Indices-of-Coronary-Physiology_2020.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.32 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.32 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1660328
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 45
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 40
social impact