Background In the Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study, fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improved outcome compared with angiography-guided PCI for up to 2 years of follow-up. The aim in this study was to investigate whether the favourable clinical outcome with the FFR-guided PCI in the FAME study persisted over a 5-year follow-up. Methods The FAME study was a multicentre trial done in Belgium, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK, and the USA. Patients (aged >= 18 years) with multivessel coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to undergo angiography-guided PCI or FFR-guided PCI. Before randomisation, stenoses requiring PCI were identified on the angiogram. Patients allocated to angiography-guided PCI had revascularisation of all identified stenoses. Patients allocated to FFR-guided PCI had FFR measurements of all stenotic arteries and PCI was done only if FFR was 0.80 or less. No one was masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events at 1 year, and the data for the 5-year follow-up are reported here. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00267774. Findings After 5 years, major adverse cardiac events occurred in 31% of patients (154 of 496) in the angiography-guided group versus 28% (143 of 509 patients) in the FFR-guided group (relative risk 0.91, 95% CI 0.75-1.10; p=0.31). The number of stents placed per patient was significantly higher in the angiography-guided group than in the FFR-guided group (mean 2.7 [SD 1.2] vs 1.9 [1.3], p<0.0001). Interpretation The results confirm the long-term safety of FFR guided PCI in patients with multivessel disease. A strategy of FFR-guided PCI resulted in a significant decrease of major adverse cardiac events for up to 2 years after the index procedure. From 2 years to 5 years, the risks for both groups developed similarly. This clinical outcome in the FFR-guided group was achieved with a lower number of stented arteries and less resource use. These results indicate that FFR guidance of multivessel PCI should be the standard of care in most patients.

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME). 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial / van Nunen, Lokien X; Zimmermann, Frederik M; Tonino, Pim A. L; Barbato, Emanuele; Baumbach, Andreas; Engstrøm, Thomas; Klauss, Volker; Maccarthy, Philip A; Manoharan, Ganesh; Oldroyd, Keith G; Ver Lee, Peter N; Van't Veer, Marcel; Fearon, William F; De Bruyne, Bernard; Pijls, Nico H. J.. - In: THE LANCET. - ISSN 0140-6736. - 386:10006(2015), pp. 1853-1860. [10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00057-4]

Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME). 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

BARBATO, EMANUELE;
2015

Abstract

Background In the Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study, fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improved outcome compared with angiography-guided PCI for up to 2 years of follow-up. The aim in this study was to investigate whether the favourable clinical outcome with the FFR-guided PCI in the FAME study persisted over a 5-year follow-up. Methods The FAME study was a multicentre trial done in Belgium, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, the UK, and the USA. Patients (aged >= 18 years) with multivessel coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to undergo angiography-guided PCI or FFR-guided PCI. Before randomisation, stenoses requiring PCI were identified on the angiogram. Patients allocated to angiography-guided PCI had revascularisation of all identified stenoses. Patients allocated to FFR-guided PCI had FFR measurements of all stenotic arteries and PCI was done only if FFR was 0.80 or less. No one was masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events at 1 year, and the data for the 5-year follow-up are reported here. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00267774. Findings After 5 years, major adverse cardiac events occurred in 31% of patients (154 of 496) in the angiography-guided group versus 28% (143 of 509 patients) in the FFR-guided group (relative risk 0.91, 95% CI 0.75-1.10; p=0.31). The number of stents placed per patient was significantly higher in the angiography-guided group than in the FFR-guided group (mean 2.7 [SD 1.2] vs 1.9 [1.3], p<0.0001). Interpretation The results confirm the long-term safety of FFR guided PCI in patients with multivessel disease. A strategy of FFR-guided PCI resulted in a significant decrease of major adverse cardiac events for up to 2 years after the index procedure. From 2 years to 5 years, the risks for both groups developed similarly. This clinical outcome in the FFR-guided group was achieved with a lower number of stented arteries and less resource use. These results indicate that FFR guidance of multivessel PCI should be the standard of care in most patients.
2015
coronary artery disease; female; humans; male; middle aged; percutaneous coronary intervention; sex factors; coronary angiography; fractional flow reserve; myocardial
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01l Trial clinico
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME). 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial / van Nunen, Lokien X; Zimmermann, Frederik M; Tonino, Pim A. L; Barbato, Emanuele; Baumbach, Andreas; Engstrøm, Thomas; Klauss, Volker; Maccarthy, Philip A; Manoharan, Ganesh; Oldroyd, Keith G; Ver Lee, Peter N; Van't Veer, Marcel; Fearon, William F; De Bruyne, Bernard; Pijls, Nico H. J.. - In: THE LANCET. - ISSN 0140-6736. - 386:10006(2015), pp. 1853-1860. [10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00057-4]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
vanNunen_Fractional-flow reserve-versus-angiography_2015.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 309.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
309.54 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1660247
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 135
  • Scopus 456
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 406
social impact