Assessing borderline personality disorder (BPD) in adolescence is very difficult due to its high symptom heterogeneity and severity. This study aimed to provide an empirically valid and clinically rich portrait of BPD identifying specific subtypes in borderline adolescent patients according to the PDM-2 framework. Fifty clinicians completed the Psychodiagnostic Chart-Adolescents of the PDM and the Therapist Response Questionnaire-Adolescents. Patients filled in the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales-Self-Report-30. Three emerging personality profiles were identified. The emotionally dysregulated subtype, characterized by the strong use of splitting, projective identification, acting, was positively related to angry/criticized and disorganized therapist responses. The impulsive–histrionic subtype, characterized by disavowal and minor image-distorting defenses, acting, was positively related to angry/criticized and sexualized therapist responses. The dependent–victimized subtype, characterized by depressive defenses, was negatively related to overinvolved/ worried therapist response. A more differentiated view of BPD may have relevant treatment implications and may help plan individualized and effective interventions in adolescence.

ASSESSING BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER IN ADOLESCENCE ACCORDING TO THE PSYCHODYNAMIC DIAGNOSTIC MANUAL-2 (PDM-2) CLINICAL FRAMEWORK / Tanzilli, Annalisa; Fiorentino, Flavia; Gualco, Ivan. - (2022), pp. 331-331. (Intervento presentato al convegno 30º Congresso dell’Associazione Italiana di Psicologia tenutosi a Padova, Italia).

ASSESSING BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER IN ADOLESCENCE ACCORDING TO THE PSYCHODYNAMIC DIAGNOSTIC MANUAL-2 (PDM-2) CLINICAL FRAMEWORK

Annalisa Tanzilli
;
Flavia Fiorentino;
2022

Abstract

Assessing borderline personality disorder (BPD) in adolescence is very difficult due to its high symptom heterogeneity and severity. This study aimed to provide an empirically valid and clinically rich portrait of BPD identifying specific subtypes in borderline adolescent patients according to the PDM-2 framework. Fifty clinicians completed the Psychodiagnostic Chart-Adolescents of the PDM and the Therapist Response Questionnaire-Adolescents. Patients filled in the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scales-Self-Report-30. Three emerging personality profiles were identified. The emotionally dysregulated subtype, characterized by the strong use of splitting, projective identification, acting, was positively related to angry/criticized and disorganized therapist responses. The impulsive–histrionic subtype, characterized by disavowal and minor image-distorting defenses, acting, was positively related to angry/criticized and sexualized therapist responses. The dependent–victimized subtype, characterized by depressive defenses, was negatively related to overinvolved/ worried therapist response. A more differentiated view of BPD may have relevant treatment implications and may help plan individualized and effective interventions in adolescence.
2022
30º Congresso dell’Associazione Italiana di Psicologia
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04d Abstract in atti di convegno
ASSESSING BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER IN ADOLESCENCE ACCORDING TO THE PSYCHODYNAMIC DIAGNOSTIC MANUAL-2 (PDM-2) CLINICAL FRAMEWORK / Tanzilli, Annalisa; Fiorentino, Flavia; Gualco, Ivan. - (2022), pp. 331-331. (Intervento presentato al convegno 30º Congresso dell’Associazione Italiana di Psicologia tenutosi a Padova, Italia).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1655816
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact