The story of King Ezana’s Obelisk of Axum and its Italian exile represents the epitomic example of the cultural and political implications of relocating architecture. The 4thcentury CE stele in basaltic stone, which stood broken in Axum, modern Ethiopia, was taken as war booty by the Italian troops after the military occupation of 1935. In 1937, the obelisk was transferred to Rome and re-erected in front of the Ministry of Italian Africa, overlooking the Circus Maximus: a graft resulting in cultural contaminations. Ethiopia had been asking for its restitution since 1947, but the stele was returned only in 2005. It was disassembled and reduced again into pieces, then transferred to Ethiopia by three cargo flight. The restitution required the export of Italian technologies and professionals to carry out the re-composition, providing the African country with the necessary knowledge to re-erect the other obelisks lying broken in Axum. From this point of view, the return of the obelisk prompted a process of knowledge transfer, opening new opportunities of cultural cooperation.

The transfer of architectural heritage as a transcultural tool. The case of the obelisk of Axum / Colonnese, Fabio; Grazia d'Amelio, Maria; Grieco, Lorenzo. - In: MOBILE CULTURE STUDIES. THE JOURNAL. - ISSN 2413-9181. - 7(2022), pp. 61-78.

The transfer of architectural heritage as a transcultural tool. The case of the obelisk of Axum

Fabio Colonnese
;
2022

Abstract

The story of King Ezana’s Obelisk of Axum and its Italian exile represents the epitomic example of the cultural and political implications of relocating architecture. The 4thcentury CE stele in basaltic stone, which stood broken in Axum, modern Ethiopia, was taken as war booty by the Italian troops after the military occupation of 1935. In 1937, the obelisk was transferred to Rome and re-erected in front of the Ministry of Italian Africa, overlooking the Circus Maximus: a graft resulting in cultural contaminations. Ethiopia had been asking for its restitution since 1947, but the stele was returned only in 2005. It was disassembled and reduced again into pieces, then transferred to Ethiopia by three cargo flight. The restitution required the export of Italian technologies and professionals to carry out the re-composition, providing the African country with the necessary knowledge to re-erect the other obelisks lying broken in Axum. From this point of view, the return of the obelisk prompted a process of knowledge transfer, opening new opportunities of cultural cooperation.
2022
Obelisk of Axum; Return of cultural property; Postcolonialism; Structure relocation; Ethiopia
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The transfer of architectural heritage as a transcultural tool. The case of the obelisk of Axum / Colonnese, Fabio; Grazia d'Amelio, Maria; Grieco, Lorenzo. - In: MOBILE CULTURE STUDIES. THE JOURNAL. - ISSN 2413-9181. - 7(2022), pp. 61-78.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Colonnese_The transfer of architectural heritage_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: cover+paper
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 6.41 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
6.41 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1655788
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact