This paper assesses the accuracy and reliability of the Theory of Critical Distances (TCD) and the Strain Energy Density (SED) approach in estimating the lifetime of plain and notched specimens subjected to cyclic loading. To validate the two approaches for plain and notched components under uniaxial and multiaxial fatigue loading, a large bulk of experimental data taken from the literature was re-analyzed, with the state variables, i.e. the stress distributions and the strain energy density, being calculated via the Finite Element (FE) method. The results obtained demonstrate that both the TCD and the SED approach can provide highly accurate fatigue life estimation. In addition, these two approaches require little computational effort and little calibration information to be implemented and used for fatigue design in situations of practical interest. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd
Comparison of TCD and SED methods in fatigue lifetime assessment / Hu, Z.; Berto, Filippo; Hong, Y.; Susmel, L.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE. - ISSN 0142-1123. - 123:(2019). [10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.009]
Comparison of TCD and SED methods in fatigue lifetime assessment
Berto Filippo;
2019
Abstract
This paper assesses the accuracy and reliability of the Theory of Critical Distances (TCD) and the Strain Energy Density (SED) approach in estimating the lifetime of plain and notched specimens subjected to cyclic loading. To validate the two approaches for plain and notched components under uniaxial and multiaxial fatigue loading, a large bulk of experimental data taken from the literature was re-analyzed, with the state variables, i.e. the stress distributions and the strain energy density, being calculated via the Finite Element (FE) method. The results obtained demonstrate that both the TCD and the SED approach can provide highly accurate fatigue life estimation. In addition, these two approaches require little computational effort and little calibration information to be implemented and used for fatigue design in situations of practical interest. © 2019 Elsevier LtdFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
TCD&SED_Paper_Vers 8.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Documento in Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore, precedente alla peer review)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
3.27 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.27 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.