To the Editor: We read the article by De Marzi et al [1] with great interest. The authors were aiming to evaluate the rate of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic resection of cancer and/or hyperplastic areas and the efficacy of combined surgical and medical treatment. The evaluation of the rate of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic resection is an important issue considering that intrauterine iatrogenic sinechiae may severely impair fertility.
Hysteroscopic Resection in Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Atypical Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer. How Important Are Intrauterine Adhesions? / Mandato, Vincenzo Dario; Palomba, Stefano; Nucera, Giuseppe Saverio; LA SALA, Giovanni Battista. - In: JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY. - ISSN 1553-4650. - 23:3(2016), pp. 453-454. [10.1016/j.jmig.2015.11.016]
Hysteroscopic Resection in Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Atypical Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer. How Important Are Intrauterine Adhesions?
Palomba, Stefano;
2016
Abstract
To the Editor: We read the article by De Marzi et al [1] with great interest. The authors were aiming to evaluate the rate of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic resection of cancer and/or hyperplastic areas and the efficacy of combined surgical and medical treatment. The evaluation of the rate of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic resection is an important issue considering that intrauterine iatrogenic sinechiae may severely impair fertility.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Mandato_Hysteroscopic_2016.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
271.09 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
271.09 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
